Saints would also love super leagues best back rower JJB

And he wont be better than him anywhere else either except perhaps centre.

you do realise how daft that comment is dont you...

Jamie Lyon kicks goals, why would we want Sinfield?

No thanks.

My hatred for Brutus, runs deeper than anyone.

As for the question asked. Peacock or Lauititi.

i think he's saying take away sinfields goal kicking and he's still head and shoulders infront of quite a few of your squad in quality, ability and things achieved for a 27 year old who's testimonial was last year

sorry 28

Thats your opinion, not mine. I'm not a fan of Sinfield, i just don't feel he would bring anything to the Saints side. I think hes over rated, tbh.

We've already got Tony P.

ah well there's a suprise!!

i dont over rate flannery ive never heard anyone rate him!! he must have had 3 good games for sanits tops.

sinfield is quality week in week out

Someone must rate him for him to have 10 state of origin caps. Mick Potter must rate him to pick him week in, week out, Daniel Anderson must rate him as he too picked him when available.

What do you mean there's a surprise? I thought everyone was entitled to an opinion?

Ooooo thats a big call. yes he's looked good but does not warrent that after half a dozen games.

dont get me wrong, i would have him at leeds for sure.

fair do's those people who pick him know more about the game than i ever will.

oh behave with this guff. The number of origin games he has played is irrelevant, the fact is its took up until 2 weeks ago for us to get a game out of him to be excited about. That says it all IMO. Hopefully he will continue that form but up to now he has been dissapointing relative to his pedigree.

Get off your high horse. No-one has said he has been playing well for Saints or anything along those lines, 'sgtwilko' said that he has never heard anyone rate him, but someone must rate him for him to pick up those 10 caps. I never said those 10 caps show that he a class player, or anything like that.

double post

i did mean the fans and media!! but your right about the coaches!!

for mine he's still bobins

So then you wouldnt have a problem then replacing him with Sinfield who has performed excellently for years in SL?

You points make no sense whatsoever. Sinfield would stroll into our team and Flannery would be one of the first he would dispose.

I think Sinfield would upset the balance of the team, him and Wilkin are too alike, and now Wilkin has stepped up his work rate, i would rather have him. If we replaced Flannery for Sinfield then we would be swapping a ball player for a work horse, and in MY opinion, this wouldn't benefit us.

Flannery may not have lived up to his state of origin caps, but there is no doubting he works hard for the team without doing anything really flashy.

Now at least we are getting some sensible reasons now though I still dissagree



Sinfield for me is more creative and has a better kicking game than Wilkin. I'd stick him in that ball playing 13 role with Wilkin as our workhorse second row who still has skill and ability. The other second row slot can go between Clough, Gilly and Flannery with one of the other 2 on the bench.

Easy one Scott Donald , classy winger straight swap for someone who isn't.

not looked the same since he was switched to the right. doesn't get enough ball and despite his age senior has the knack of putting him in space.smith/watkins/ablett doesn't do that enough

Garnder has improved though

Hehehehehe has he!!

eh...................

No!!!!!!!!!!!!

Errrrr.......... NONE OF THEM, THANK YOU