Had the same walking out of the ground mate he was spot on until someone from Leeds "had a word" at half time ,we did chuckle!

Probably not actually. If you listen to the commentary when he is playing how many times does his name get mentioned?

Calf strain/tear

Great, now you have said that, I look forward to a really close game against Wigan, and Leeds emerging victorious after putting in a vastly improved performance.

There you go. I made your week better. No need for thanks, lunch will do.

Of course, making your weekend is someone else's responsibility so don't moan at me if we get trounced Friday night.

Harlequins RL kept us scoreless until the 79th minute in April 09 at Headingley.

What agenda?

This was a thread which initially contained contributions by people who were listening to commentary of the game on the radio.

At no stage did it ever pretend to be anything other than that, despite the sanctimonious appearance of one particular individual who decided to derail the thread with his [i"I attended the game therefore..."[/i agenda.

Nice effort. Had you and our other radio experts been complaining about the quality of the commentary, you might have a point. But you weren't, you were commenting about the Leeds performance.

Those who went have, quite rightly quashed your agenda and those who dance to the tune of your flute.

Relax.

It's only Wigan next week.

And if you take notice of our resident five year old behaviourist, Wigan are shot to pieces and Warrington are now the real deal. His ability to reach such a rapid conclusion on the basis of one solitary game or performance is a knee-jerking joy to behold



OTOH, he could be just posting with other agendae in mind

"You twist and turn, like a twisty turny thing" Keith.

So nice to see that you have obviously dropped your previous trolling persona in favour of a new more genuine bona fide version.

What did you think of Charnley Friday?

Speaking of the ref today, what was our sin-binning for? Was it for repeat offending?

[iThey said on the radio[/i it was for dissent, but maybe it was for persistent fouling, which in itself would be just as bad.

I've no idea what you are alluding to here. All my comments on the game today were based upon listening to the radio commentary and nothing more. The context was clear and unambiguous all along.

Next week, I shall be passing comments after the game against Wigan on the basis of my attendance. Once again, the context is clear and unambiguous.

Burgess had been on the pitch a matter of seconds before he was back on the bench - if it was for persistent offending then Burgess was real unlucky to cop for it.

Sinbinnings are the hottest thing out of the RFL this weekend. Everybody who is anybody (oh, and Bradford) is getting at least one. We had two! See how many you can collect next weekend. You won't have a bleeding clue what they were for (even after watching the highlights of your game on The Superleague Show) but they do enhance the excitement.

His performance was disappointingly poor, much like the rest of the Wigan players on the night.

Nonetheless, my knee remained static throughout.

[url=http://loverugbyleague.com/news_5264-rhinos-second-half-stampede-too-much-for-wildcats.htmlA match report here.[/url

Keith, just so I'm clear, will the threads you post on next week only be open to people who have attended the game, rather than watched it on TV or listened on the radio?

Just want to understand the ground rules.

Did Mr and Mrs Dean really not realise that calling their son Chris would result in him having a girls name?

I expected a possessed 50's Hot Rod to come on and get the prize.

Subtle.

It's good that you're checking as Keith said you were missing the point completely a page or two back.

Good work.

How did Bailey play today?

Listened to the 2nd half and didn't hear his name once.