Shame, it did us no harm.

No, you just sign drug cheating rugby league stars...

No, that's Cas, Ryan Hudson.

Who got banned while been a Bradford player

Ryan Hudson, wasn't a known drug cheat when we signed him, big difference, to signing him when it's well known that he cheated with performances enhancers.

Edited for accuracy.

Who rattled this guy's cage anyway?

Still, it's more interesting than a Wakey troll.

Errr, No. Ryan Hudson was not known to be a drug cheat when we signed him. That's all there is to it. You signed him full well knowing he was a drug cheat, and that's all there is to that.

You signed him and then he became a drug cheat, coincidence?

If we give you a gold star and tell you that you are king of the internet, will you go away?

No, we signed him in faith that he wasn't, and fired him when we became aware he was. You signed him to play for you with full knowledge that he was a cheat, same as you did with Chambers.

And with 1 past-tense word in bold, the case is closed.

The only club he has been caught taking drugs at is bradford. When he played for us the first time (and wakey) there was no problem, then he played for you (a team with a history of cheating, ie salary cap) and was caught cheating. He serves his time and then plays for hudds and cas (whilst being one of the most regularly tested men in rl) and there is no problem.


So to recap- in two spells at cas, as well as one at hudds and wakey, no cheating.

One spell at bulls, cheating.

The club he's at when he's caught cheating has nothing to do with it though, it's not a clubs fault a player has decided to cheat the game.

or are you suggesting the Bulls encouraged Hudson to take performances enhancing drugs?

At the end of the day, we cut him when he was caught, you signed a known drug cheat, aswell as offering opportunity to an other

Well it depends if someone influenced him doesnt it? after all theres no evidence to suggest he ever did it at other clubs, so what made him want to do it in the first place i wonder



You had no coice but to 'cut him off' he was banned.

Cas have every right to give him a second chance though, after all he didnt do anything wrong when he played for us before (obviously better influences at cas than bradford), he has served his time according to the rules of the game.

By the way i was wondering if you could help me, after the solomona, harris and platt sagas which player are the bulls going to be signing illegally this year?

Yeah somebody influenced him, himself. Why did he wan't to do it in the first place?....err, to enhance his performance....obviously, you know...performance enhancers.????

Why didn't we have a choice?, he was our employeee, he was banned from 2 years, we signed him for 3, but seen as though we don't want to be assosiated with drugs cheats, we terminated his contract, straight away.

Cas have every right to do what they wan't, and they showed that they are tolerant of drugs, and known drugs cheats when they signed Hudson and trialed Chambers.

Yeah I can help you, nobody.

So as we've already established hudson only cheated when he was at bulls, so theres no problem with signing him because he doesnt cheat when he plays for other clubs, he only cheated as a bulls player. Strange that isnt it.

No players at cas take performance enhancing drugs, whilst bradford players do.

Yeah bulls were going to pay him for 3 years when he could only play for one, yeah thats some choice.

Good to know, the bulls arejust sticking to trying to sign blokes who attack women then.

All that's been established is that you have somehow got it into your numb skull that he was somehow encouraged or influenced to take performance enhancers by staff at Bulls. Ryan decided that, all by himself, it was nothing to do with the people at the club he was at, or indeed what club he was at.

No players at Cas taking performance enhancers?..well blow me away, but don't you continue to employ the man in question who is indeed a known taker of performance enhancing substances?

Adding further more to Castleford's assosiation with drug cheats and drug takers, you employ a man suspended in Australia for taking illegal, class a, recreational drugs, Mitchell Sargent.

Bulls were not going to pay him for 3 years when he couldn't play for 2, but they still had the choice wether to continue to employ him in some capacity withing the club, we choose not to, because we don't assosiate our selves with drug takers and performance cheats.

Who are Bulls trying to sign that attacks females?

Dont start making up facts!!!

If you are banned, you can not have any involvment in the game during that period!!!

Says who?

The World Anti-Doping Authority, which Rugby League is a co operating member

Doesn't mean that they can't be employed by the club though.

They cant have any involved in their sport during that time (cant train, cant coach etc etc)!!!! It is not hard to understand.......well l thought not anyway!

They may not be able to coach, train and play their sport during their suspension, but they can still be employed by clubs, but in a non playing, coaching capacity, ask Wigan and Gareth Hock.

Sorry, what's your point again?