|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4630 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It is and it isn't about funding depending on the context.
For example, if the difference in funding from the SL clubs is too large then that will most likely be too big a gulf to cross so it would be about "lack" of funding.
If as Starby says the amount the Championship clubs get increases so as to close the gap to a fair level it then does depend on what the clubs spend it on.
If they do spend it only on players certainly in the case of existing team members it may just mean the same players playing for the same club on the same field but just getting more to do it and that won't take them forward.
Bringing in other players from outside will usually mean the wage bill going up.
It's not only about what your club decides to do either, they may well decide to spread the monies across a broader area with a bigger medium to longer term view in mind but it only takes a few of their rival clubs to spend it on players wages and the going rate goes up whether you want it to or not and to get the best you have to match or better the rates.
Also on spectators a problem with keeping the existing fan base and certainly to increase it does often come down to how well the team is performing on the field.
Look at Bradford a few years ago when they were at the very top and went on to win grand finals and the world club challenge.
They had increased crowds and introduced pre match entertainment, bouncy castles etc etc.
I can remember Eddie Hemmings proclaiming loud and proud at one of their live games as the cameras panned across a packed Odsal.
Quote. " Rugby League take note, look at what the Bulls have achieved."
Many of the crowd were new supporters, problem was as soon as the Bulls started losing a few games the novelty wore off and they drifted away and we all know what has happened since then.
Thinking about decline and the new system it may well be that an chance to go into the top flight of SL will come about because a club in there starts to struggle to a point where they can't sustain their place.
In that case there could well be a few clubs from the Championship in a much better place to step up and now at least the door is open and structure in the game to do so.
It may well not be just down to the normal channels of promotion and relegation.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5159 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="FevGrinder"Not sure it is more difficult that what we have had the last 6 years, in that at worst the new system will give us 1 SL team versus 1 Championship team (4v5) for the final SL place the following year (and it is possible to be in the top 3 and qualify without the playoff game). I don't see that being harder than qualifying for SL via the licensing route (when it appears as an outsider teh SL clubs want to keep a closed shop). To get to the point of being the championship club that gets to that one game playoff will be hard and with the 2 ex-SL teams joining the championship it will be harder still for the current teams in our league, however Sheffield have made and won the equivalent GF game in the last 2 years so why not again in 2015? And come the start of the 2015 season well all start on zero points with everything to play for.
Do I like the 2x12 into 3x8, you know I don't. It is too hard to manage for a whole raft of reasons, and therefore I personally would have preferred 2x12 with a 1 up 1 down. However if this had been adopted I think it would have still been as hard to get into SL as the new 2x12 -> 3x8 for the current championship teams, given this would still mean getting past the relegated SL teams, and as we have seen in the past (pre licensing) this is hard to achieve.
At least the new system will allow a route via P&R that is decided on the pitch (assuming minimum criteria is meet), which the previous licensing system didn't.
Key to all of this is how the funding is managed, it the current discrepancy of virtually 10 to 1 (SL to Championship) is kept it is always going to be virtually impossible to break into SL. And it appears from the outside that this is the hardest question for the SL clubs to agree on.'"
Fair comment Dave. Just a couple of points to think about.
1. If we hadn't changed the system, Fev would have been putting together a licence bid at this moment and I'd have tipped them to replace London for 2015. Instead, Fev are hoping to win a place in the 2016 $uperleague - when, for all we know, London may have found another backer.
2. Sheffield don't have the crowds to be accepted in $uperleague. Fact.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="griff1998"Fair comment Dave. Just a couple of points to think about.
1. If we hadn't changed the system, Fev would have been putting together a licence bid at this moment and I'd have tipped them to replace London for 2015. Instead, Fev are hoping to win a place in the 2016 $uperleague - when, for all we know, London may have found another backer.
2. Sheffield don't have the crowds to be accepted in $uperleague. Fact.'"
Nobody does at present, that is the problem, however it isnt just a case of a winning team means more fans either, yes I'd expect the ' Interested parties,Leigh,Fax,Fev,Eagles ' to all win the majority of their home games giving them all ( possibly except Sheffield ) the opportunity to increase their fan bases, but can and will they try to achieve it?
Leigh by the way have a ' Business Plan ' that predicts they can be ' successful/competitive ' in SL on 4,000 averages, , yes, thats what I thought as well
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5159 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Starbug"
Leigh by the way have a ' Business Plan ' that predicts they can be ' successful/competitive ' in SL on 4,000 averages,
, yes, thats what I thought as well'"
Eh dear.
What's competitive ? Losing all their games but not by many ?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 714 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="griff1998"Fair comment Dave. Just a couple of points to think about.
1. If we hadn't changed the system, Fev would have been putting together a licence bid at this moment and I'd have tipped them to replace London for 2015. Instead, Fev are hoping to win a place in the 2016 $uperleague - when, for all we know, London may have found another backer.
2. Sheffield don't have the crowds to be accepted in $uperleague. Fact.'"
I suspect your right about 1 (I was even starting to believe it as a possibility myself even though I believe SL as a whole don't want us at the top table) - but I personally would rather see Fev in the championship for the next 20 years and longer if it meant this P&R was introduced in a responsible way, since for me sport should be about what happens on the pitch not in the boardroom (I accept that in modern day they clubs have to be run as sensible businesses at the same time).
As for 2 I believe that Sheffield has the greatest potential out of all the Championship 1 sides (and Skolars even more so). However for whatever reason the Eagles have not been able to sell themselves to the Sheffield public. I know people say that Sheffield is a football city, but I don't fully buy into this, in that the Steelers can pull crowds of 3.5k for a sport that get even less coverage than RL. Biggest problem for the Eagles is to have a "true" home, but suspect that would take 20M from a benefactor or the city council, neither seems very likely at the moment.
I still have big concerns about the Championship 1 level, there is talk about 2 regional (north & south) divisions of 10, but to achieve this would require 7 extra teams which could include Toulouse (though again I am not convinced Toulouse is sustainable unless they were in SL). I just don’t see where these teams could come from to start in 2015, and where would the funds come from to support them?
I will take the 2x12 into 3x8 for the moment hopefully with a better distribution of money), but believe this will have to change again to give us something more sustainable. This just still feels very much a gimmick.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 714 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Starbug"Nobody does at present, that is the problem, however it isnt just a case of a winning team means more fans either, yes I'd expect the ' Interested parties,Leigh,Fax,Fev,Eagles ' to all win the majority of their home games giving them all ( possibly except Sheffield ) the opportunity to increase their fan bases, but can and will they try to achieve it?
Leigh by the way have a ' Business Plan ' that predicts they can be ' successful/competitive ' in SL on 4,000 averages,
, yes, thats what I thought as well'"
P&R will help to a point, as will a winning side, but as you articulate better than most the clubs have to promote themselves in a greater fashion than they have in the past.
PS I believe it is possible to be moderately successful on crowds of 4,000 if you can maximise other revenue streams. Assuming you need income of around £3M per annum to have any chance of being stable in SL, this could come from:
- 1.2M sky money
- 900k Gate receipts (average of say £15 x 4000 x 14 home games)
- 1M in sponsorship, and other streams
Though to have a real chance at the GL you would need another £1M and this would require gates of 8000-10000
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 16601 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2024 | Nov 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 8194 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2015 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
| |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|