I'm regularly called a parasite. Might look up the Latin name for it, more exotic.

That went quite well:
[uBab[/uesiosis
[uCocc[/uidia
[uPhleb[/uotomus

Even more wounded, now.

Don't bring Philip into it.

Coccidia sounds kind of nice, appeals to my Italian side.

If you have a complaint about the moderation of this board, you know what you can do with it.



If you don't like it you could always set up your own board, free from the tyranny of moderation and uninvited gormcloptitude. oh.

Only Sandra has registered a score so far from HU. Deadline mid-morning tomorrow, whenever I rouse myself from my unpaid militant lie-in. Too cold for picket duty.

Cheeky Devil. You've had Sid Domic, Charlie Stone and a score of 12 hits from me (as Australia, ironically). Have you made me a foe, or what?

Still working on Seany-Babes. Gonna be worth waiting for, mind.

A score of seventeen may I remind the honourable member for Frankenstein.

League Unlimited seams to be down, that's amusing.

Right, MR, at the risk of being ignored again, please accept this as my final score on the door and entry:



Ta muchly.

...

Wrong place.

"Seams"
Look at me, sewing trousers.

Sorry I haven't been around alot lately, been busy "slugging".

Go dum-dum, go dum-dum!

It cheated me in the end, did that trick where it keeps throwing balls that you can't hit but as I was on a winner, I tried anyway.

So what did you really get?

Right this is the best I've got, looks a bit rubbish next to DumDums but hey ho..

Here's mine.

When's the deadline? Any late entries to challenge my 113?

About half twelve, I've given up, I've got worse with practice.

These are from Mrs B and Marfa who were struggling to upload their screenshots, I can't remember who's was who's, sorry MR.

Okay, that'll do. I'll just work out the rankings...

Right. Alleged skullduggery and potential controversy - an inquiry has been launched, due to the same scorecards been submitted in more than one name. Scientists may be easy to fool, but only if there is internal consistency. We're sods for fine detail. The following have made it through, either honestly or cleverly - a review panel will now be convened to look at the evidence. Okay, it'll just be me in my vest and pants, but 'review panel' sounds better.


dum-dum - 113
Sean18 - 32
Barham - 17
Worminhand - 17
Sandra 14 (I still can't find your 17)
tom155 - 12
Chicken Hunter - 9
roopy - 6


Definately out - Philb, Baron vo Mandor and Matt23.

Under review

- LRR, Mrs B, Marfa.

Edit

With regret, LRR is disqualified for recycling Sandra's scorecard. Nice try, though!



dum-dum, the 17 you submitted on behalf of Mrs B/MM had already been used by WiH. I can find no reason not to accept the 11 though, so due to my trusting nature/possible incompetence, I'll accept it as legitimate - could you just check and see which of them it belongs to? Cheers.

Details of the next, and I think penultimate challenge to follow. There'll be options to vote for.

Where is the evidence of this libellous claim?