GML was hinting that it wasn't though, as the mistake had been "rectified", perhaps implying he's been paid out?

He said 'rectifies' iirc. Changing the tense removes the possibility that he meant simply, that IHO, it'll be rectified passively - that is the mistake won't be repeated/compounded. Whichever he meant, I guess he'd be happy to leave it ambiguous - to avoid being wrong or it being a leak. If I didn't know better I'd say that you are, very elegantly, trying to make mischieve (sp?).

We could do it on the monthly .......not a King's ransom, i suppose

Why thank you, sir.



He said of Morgan "He does make mistakes like Mills getting 2 years but then he rectifies them." So if the mistake was a 2 year deal, and he's completed one year, how would the mistake become rectified unless he's shipped out?

Interesting. "...he rectifies them." in this sentence could mean Justine is going to rectify the mistake, but could also mean she already has done so.

Present tense could mean past or future.

I just think GML likes to keep us all guessing.

The little tease.

Utterly marvellous grammatical case building. This really is top drawer work Mild Rover and if you don't win poster of the year [ipurely[/i for this, then this fair Isle will be all the worse.

Madam Barista, you need to polish those shoes up to a brighter sheen.

Would have gotten away with it too if it hadn't been for that meddling Mild Rover.

I've downgraded us from Malmaison to The Sheraton Piccadilly just from this, any more slips and it's a ruddy Travelodge! Shape up, for god's sake.

Too kind. You can tell it has turned nasty when it gets polite.

The Grand Final is 12 months away yet, as is David Mills leaving Rovers. I think. Staying/leaving/released/paid off/told he can speak to other clubs/integral cog in the Rovers machine..The "Mills Mind Games" - it's all too much.

Classic Coffee person diversion of thread, in fact, I'd lay money that you couldn't tell a Jamaican High Mountain from a MochaChoccaSkinnyLatté.

Premier Lodge a' beckons...

85k over 2 years

New swear filter in operation, I see.



The topic is Rovers 2010 if you're getting huffy about thread drift. I see electronic turnstiles, hideous away shirts, suboptimal retail operations, 2 more derby wins and a 5th place finish. And Cooke's contract not being renewed.

Who mentioned injury? Not me.
It is some record for a prop to maintain form for a full season given the physical demands and intensity of the position.
Not quite sure where you are coming from with the Graham Horne comparison. A fringe player who fills in here and there?

Maintain form! You didnt say that at all.



I dont think contracts should be given out solely on been available for every game in a season....

If a player is selected for all 27 league games and 3 cup games i would suggest he has maintained his form. Wouldnt you?
There is also a world of difference between been available for selection and actually been selected.

Good lord you really need to make it more difficult than this.
a) Thread drift is my stock in trade.
b) Couldn't give a monkeys how I get into the ground, it isn't my business.
c) You'll never catch me in anything other than Saville Row's finest.
d) Suboptimal ( is that really a word, other than in the dullest of accountant speak?) retail operations, sorry, I'm yawning again.
e Derby wins, you [ireally[/i need that pointing out to you as a women of your [iobvious[/i intelligence?
f) Cooke, after all this time, does anyone really give a fuc*?

So in a nutshell Mills rightly got a 2 year contract then for maintaining his form over 30 games?

Thats what i said in my first post.



You are adding weight to the cabbage claims mate.

Dont agree with your argument. Think mitigating circumstances meant Mills played every game and I seem to remember surprise when a 2 year deal was handed to him.

I suppose last seasons non appearance and the call for a release by every man and his dog adds some weight to it not been the best move.

Mitigating circumstances? Expain please.

Sam Moa has just been given a 2 year contract on the back of his performances this season. Who is to say how he will perform next season? Nobody can predict the future.

Think the disappointing form of Crossman gave Mills more game time and your lack of depth at prop in general that year.

Last season when Vella got injured Mills must have thought 'here we go, I am in! time to maintain a bit of form....what do you mean Lovegrove is propping with netherton?'



Has Mills been given a fair crack since signing his deal or has Morgan changed his opinion big style?

Think Moa earned his contract by showing some 'good' form and he may well be gone at the end of next season, who knows, but I reckon he will need to play poorly to get released.

Crossman missed only one game all 2008! Wigan away Easter Monday.
As i have said previously on this thread, Mills form has gone downhill fast this season and not taken advantage of any of his opportunities in first or reserve grade.
Doesnt change the fact he was worthy of the contract at the time it was offered.

My fault that. RBA and me had a chat in a pub a good few weeks ago where i banded some figures about. For some reason though he thinks i'm in the know and has quoted it since.