You do seem to have more than your fair share of players/coaches brought in then chucked out early over the last 2 years - Ward, Gannon, Crossman, Fozzard, McCormack, Crooks, maybe Mills. TBF, though, the response to the appointment of Blanchard was OTT, and not just from Hudgell.

Thought you had a "Mr Barista " ?

One and the same.

Thought you was married

Your obsession is completely OTT yet you're still allowed on here.







By the way, are you really an accountant?

You are clearly obsessed with Rovers. I cant really say anything else on the matter...

Is it because we can afford to pay off non performing players whereas your own club is forced to play them until the contracts run out or pay them off on the monthly.

Surely Mills is the counter arguement to that for you guys?

Interesting though that you seem to know our agreements for paying playings off, you do realise that clubs paying monthly will be spending on next years cap? You do also realise that we had a huge chunk of cash spare from Crocker not coming to pay some of the people off in 1 go?

Nice try though.

No you didn't, the whole hilarious saga cost you an arm and a leg.

Kingy wants to know who you managed to pay off in one go

Rubbish, refer to my quote in your sig for my answer to that one.

Kingy has been telling all sorts of different people different stories according to some, there's also lots of stories that people simply make up. I wouldnt believe all that you hear.

Fair dues, didn't realise I had so much heat on your board with some members.

I would believe he's still in your squad for next season. Still once those monthly payments have finished you'll be rid.

My understanding is that he hasnt officially been released yet but that he will be before the cap for 2010 kicks in.

Thats why i said my understanding. I can choose to believe it ifi want tobut ultimately no one knows til things happen and in this instance im pretty sure most people dont know factually the payment deals for FCs exiting playings. Isnt this a forum for speculation though?

I would have thought that a reasonable slice of Crockers salary would have been taken up by Cordobas, Tanseys and Broughtons salaries. I would expect enough left over to pay King off though.

Todd Byrne was paid off very early in the season also. Not sure what ramifications that would have?

All guesswork.

Why Would Byrne been paid off have any ramifications? His salary was already accounted for on this years cap so giving him it early is neither here nor there. I suppose Hull will have missed out on the interest had the money been in their account but with rates as they are would it really make a difference?

Not read the full tit for tat mate but I assume by mentioning Cordoba and Tansey you are discussing how did we have room? Nobody mentionned that Byrne budgeted figure will have gone by March co I am sure we paid him off.

Bottom line is you both havent a clue exactly how much any player either gets paid or was paid off but carry on...

This is a stupid argument, it's a living cap that is monitored by Red Hall, no one is over the cap, and any pay offs or new signings now have to be sanctioned.

We spent nowhere near full cap last season, so there would have been plenty of room.

King was telling all and sundry that he was getting two payouts to pay up his contract - one immediately and the other at the end of the year. Neither of these will count on next year's cap.

I assume the split payment is to allow a chance for King to find another club in the intervening period, as this would eliminate the need for the second payment.

Nothing to see here. Move on.

Mrs B is not a mod