I think I would be tempted to have Ogres babies if it wasn't for the fact I'm a straight heterosexual male!

I was gutted i was talking to my mate and missed it, when I turned round he was sparked out on the floor...Wonder if any ones going to get it on you tube, could get more hits then 'O'Meley vs gibbs'.

Was almost a carbon copy.

Can't wait for the superleague show now

Just turned it on, has our game been on yet?

Think you missed it mate.

yes!!!!!!!!! poor quality(crowd sound etc)

Yep, footage of the players coming out with comments on how Saints were weakened by injuries (no mention of Berro, Calders, Lauaki, Horne, obviously), then just the tries. Then in the studio they discussed Saints performance, the fact they were missing Eastmond, the fact that Saints needed more field position in the second half. Then 10 seconds spent discussing Hull in which JD said we've got plenty of work to do. Happy Days.

Didn't even show the 'hit' did it?

Sounds about right doesn't it

Not once was there any credit to Hull......

When do we play Wakey

We got no credit the year we finished 2nd, so the chances of us getting any when Saints, Warrington and Wigan are above us are less than zero.

Ah well....I am happy with going under the radar.

didn't expect them to show it to be honest.especially with wilkin in the studio.

When will you scousers realise that they is a difference between running with a ball and tackling ?

Roby's technique was all wrong, he went up high on a guy whose maybe three times as big as him and paid the price. I'd have to see replays to see if they was an illegal forearm but at first glance it just looked liked Roby went high and came off second best.

what about meli throwing the first pucnh at whiting on the touchline at halfway ,right in front of the east stand.

right in front of me,and he only got a ticking off!! should have got 10 mins.

www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1979 Name Mark O’Meley Incident considered Use of forearm in possession of the ball in 54th minute (Roby) Decision [uNo charge[/u Details of Charge / Reason for NF Opponent’s head makes contact with players shoulder in attempting to tackle, arm not raised before contact and no collision with forearm, players arm rises after contact but [uno misconduct[/u

www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1979 Name Mark O’Meley Incident considered Use of forearm in possession of the ball in 54th minute (Roby) Decision [uNo charge[/u Details of Charge / Reason for NF Opponent’s head makes contact with players shoulder in attempting to tackle, arm not raised before contact and no collision with forearm, players arm rises after contact but [uno misconduct[/u

Disappointingly Fozzard was cited for the same (raised forearm) but was not charged.

That will mickey on a few bonfires near Liverpool

Yup, however Fozzard had the punishment that he made the mistake of offending Fitz with the incident. Fitz punished him for the remainder of the game.

Just watch the highlights ..M O'Meley and Roby tackle was shown ..Red hall got it right no charge to answer ..It show Mark taking the ball in and his arm is tucked into his chest.. Roby try to tackle him but the shoulder part catches his head .. I hope the Saints fan who listen on the radio watch it

you probably wont get any of the st's fans who was complaining coming on here..