Where would brough play at hkr, can't see it happening tbh

Surely we've missed the April fools day deadline??

Could be because Wakefield end up one half back down. Thought more realistically Cooke and Brough to swap. Don't want Cooke back, he has been rubbish at Rovers and would be a step backwards for me.

I think Cooke and Horne both miss each other badly. It was a partnership that countered both of their weaknesses, Cooke's defence isn't fantastic and he isn't the quickest...but that didn't matter because he had Horne alongside him. And vice-versa Horne can't kick or organise, but he had Cooke playing with him.

that said I won't attend another FC match if Cooke returns, his actions that weekend in 2007 led us to be in this poor situation. Yes it is the clubs fault for not replacing him sufficiently...but his actions won't ever be forgotten.

Why would Rovers want two Scrum Halves and no Stand Off?

It does, but this is rugby league and more particularly Hull FC. Nothing would surprise me. If it were to happen, that 300+ pages thread must be re-opened.

TBH can't see Hethrington or Rule allowing it to happen ever

Baron Von Munchhausen.

nothing surprises me at this club, if we launch a 'anti drink driving' campaign we know the announcement is only a day or two away

I certainly fekkin' [ihope[/i so. Cooke back at FC would be a disgrace.

Would be funny though.

Quote ="CHURCHILL"Would be funny though. '" www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... -riot.html The final word went to Agar, who said: "Paul Cooke has not been our problem for 14 months and I doubt he will ever be again." That alone must increase the chances of it happening.

Quote ="CHURCHILL"Would be funny though. '" www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... -riot.html The final word went to Agar, who said: "Paul Cooke has not been our problem for 14 months and I doubt he will ever be again." That alone must increase the chances of it happening.

IF Cooke did come back, Hull Fc would not be getting a penny out of me.

Well I for one would welcome him back. He went somewhere where he could make more money and play for his boyhood team to boot. I can't blame him for that and it's not his fault we are in the position we are now. It is Hull's for not replacing him.

If he genuinely does want to come back I would have him because he is exactly what is missing. The only problem is that he will have a lot of bridges to build with players and fans alike.

That said it's a load of b0ll0cks so this post has been a complete waste of time.

Worst case of selective memory syndrome I've ever seen.

On top of that, he's not actually very good. We've got a better player for next in year in Sean Long.

oh come off it, if he'd decided to go to his 'boyhood' club at the end of his contract we'd have understood, not running away in the space of a weekend on a technicality in his contract.

and how would we be able to trust him? his off the field behavior was hardly good last time he was here either

Don't think he would with the players,most would have him back in a flash

That explains why we have so many problems then.

They're thick.

There might just be something in that!

Would you like to expand on that? I was disappointed with the way he left but right from the start I never really blamed him.

Too right, who does Agar think he is, the coach?

Although he plays in a different position

6 Horne
7 Long
13 Cooke

or

6 Horne
7 Thorman
13 Radford

?

Would keep Maloney and possible Moa (1000 posts on the thread

)