Quote ="Amadeo Avogadro"icon_biggrin.gifEPRESSED: It's going to be a long night.'" viewtopic.php?f=34&t=399668 Ahh .. Those were the days

Quote ="Amadeo Avogadro"icon_biggrin.gifEPRESSED: It's going to be a long night.'" viewtopic.php?f=34&t=399668 Ahh .. Those were the days

Excellent work my friend,really enjoyed reading them comments and the same regular posters aswell how odd!!

Why is it odd? People acknowledged when Hall had a good few games last season, then, when he started playing badly (which he has done more or less ever since) they commented on that too. Nothing odd about it. Is there a particular 'regular poster' who has posted something specific that you find odd, or did you just feel the need to make a vague sort of comment in support of your mate?

No just odd people like you!!

You lot can carry on arguing all day.



See you in The Three Pigeons.

Ah, right. So you can point to a post of mine in that thread that you thought was 'odd' can you? Or even one that's at odds with my current view of Hall's abilities?

To make it easier for you, I was posting as 'Rock God X' back then.

They was always going to have a fully strength squad out there, There playing for 2nd spot.

Pretty certain that Briers + one other front line player, maybe Morley or Westwood, will be rested.

Hence some of us believing the Leeds game as being the more realistic of
the two games to win, for obvious (to some of us) reasons!

Thing is that just about sums up the frustrating thing about Hall. He started out like a house on fire at FB and finished up looking like someone who'd never played a game there in his life. There's no doubt he has the skills but he just doesn't seem to be able to get his head together long enough to play as well as he is capable on a consistent basis.

My concern about playing him there tonight is that his memories of the role aren't exactly happy ones and we all know that if he's lacking confidence he plays badly. Add in the fact that he hasn't had a first team game for a few weeks and it could be a bad night for both him and FC.

[url=http://www.skysports.com/rugbyleague/match_preview/0,19936,11070_3310092,00.htmlSky's preview of the game.[/url

Hardly a mention of our injury problems. In fact, James Lowes goes one further:



So no first choice scrum half, stand off or full back - arguably the three most important positions on the park - is 'getting there'? That's before mentioning the problems on the right wing.

I remember Rock God, he was a decent poster




he will not find any dirt on me, I have always though Hally was pants in defence



He also went on the KR board and blamed the coaches for feeding Hally to the wolfs

....he has had more opportunites than many in his position imo.

That would be a sensible option, think about Wembley

Decent? I think you'll find 'awesome' is the word you're looking for.

Well he certainly knew his rugby!

I might resurrect him. The only reason I stopped posting as Rock God was because my old computer went tits up and I couldn't remember my login details when I got my new one. I found them again a few weeks ago when I was going through some old stuff. Maybe I should be like one of those sad posters with two IDs and use one of them to back up everything I post to make it appear like someone actually agrees with me.

Good idea, that is.

I agree I suspect a few have more than 1 ID!!!

Not me because I don't care if any-one agree's with me...I am always right anyway

Presumably he means we are getting players back at the right time for Warrington, i.e. after we've played them.

I know, not sure who he is talking about tbh.
We've got the majority of our first choice backline out and no halfbacks. Bodies back indeed!

Fook, hall at FB. No briers though

Yes, because Monaghan, and Myler fighting for a Wembley spot, are so poor.


Wonder whether Eddie can beat his hideous fawning commentary on Tompkins last week with a Myler love-in.

Aye good news...hopefully damage limitation...although I have a feeling there maybe a shock on the cards



Could just be the voddy kicking in though