I know you think it could turn out well, I just don't understand why on earth you'd think that. Agar has clung onto a role at the club for nearly 7 years now despite all around him getting the chop, if he managed to do it again it would be little short of criminal IMO.

I haven't suggested there was a power struggle at Wire once. I'm pointing out that when J Sharpe was brought in to work with Agar it didn't go well at all because Agar wanted responsibility for everything, and it was a similar situation when Uncle Dennis was brought in... why would anyone think it would be different this time?

If we want him, he'll stay.

we don't want him

We dont want him he aint good enough.

A bit better is still not good enough.

Jesus calm down Gary



Your two examples are irrelevant both Sharpe & Dennis were brought in under Agar, a DOR would be above him, like Wire, there would be no power struggle as I am sure the DOR would say like it or lump it mate, or words to that effect



Hopefully none of it will happen though as Agar will be given his P45, however like I say if it does it may not be as bad as people think.

Why? He's not brilliant, but should be given a chance after his loan spell imo.

OK, just couldn't be bothered to read through 62 pages or drivel!

You could get 3 out of that list even though 2 are in contract

If Bomber was to come in as an advisor to help assess the players and coaching set up and oversee the Agar departure and subsequent employment of a new coach then i could live with that but it needs to be done now and not in the close season.

I commented that I didn't think it was intended as an attack although pointed out some of the language was OTT. He agreed and even apologised.

You mentioned ICM yesterday on a thread which had nothing to do with him so not in my opinion.

Jon Sharp was Operations Manager, I always thought that was above Agar on the org chart.

Tony Smith joined Warrington as Head of Coaching and not Director of Rugby. James Lowes was then appointed "first team coach". That's the same job title John Kear had under Shaun McRae at Hull.

In effect Lowes was demoted.

[urlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/warrington/7925533.stm[/url

IMO the director of rugby role [ican[/i work, but the coach has to be on board with the idea to stand any chance. It could be a decent option for us to get more rugby sensibility into the running of the club.

I don't think that Agar should fit into plans either way, though, he's simply outstayed his welcome now.

hang on, when was Agar EVER welcome at FC??!?!?!?

More than you think,usually by the away supporters.

Has there ever been an example of a DOR and a head coach working? You need to have one person in charge IMO.

I was willing to give him a chance, as were plenty of others. He's had it, and failed.

He might not have ever been the man we wanted, but he was welcome to prove his worth. Arguably he did, it just wasn't much.

you said he was not having a dig



afterwards yes.



where?

fair point

Somebody else made the point, most other clubs are owned and run by people who essentially do what we'd possibly get a DOR in for.

I'd prefer we got the right coach in and didn't need to go down the DOR route, I'm just saying that it [icould[/i work with the right people, as it can actually suit both parties depending on what responsibilities they want.

We should be pulling out all the stops to sign Daniel Anderson before he joins the club who have just binned his brother in law

dont think anderson would see rovers as potential winners of trophys, hopefuly with AP in charge we may turn the corner under anderson and win something...

Would hope we are doing so regardless of what's happening across the river.

Rovers bound already .