wrong he had lost contact before horne touched it

There was no visible seperation of the ball and Fosters hand,if ther ehad of been then the try would of stood

no it would have been called back for the second knock on by horne..

Hull got the ball back straight away anyway, Shenton was bundled into touch about five seconds after the scrum.

15m further down the pitch

That was the one decision that bothered me, the rest I thought was about right.

we had 9 1st teamers out injured, and we where still bloody unlucky not to win! so stop spitting ya dummies out, god help ya when we put our strongest side out against you.

Like in the two matches last year eh?

9 first teamers, really? I think you are including the youngsters too.

We had four out.

In your team yesterday, you had:
2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 on the pitch. That's 9 of your starting 13 right there. Then you've got 22 (Foster) who is your number one kicker at the moment so he'd be in there most likely, and 15 (LMS).

9 1st teamers? They do love to exaggerate in St Helens don't they!
My Saints friend tried to tell me we played a team full of teenagers and they only had 25% (yes 25%!) of their 1st team playing. Well, I told him the above and also they only had one teenager.

Saints have a lot of injuries. But mainly to the back up players, not to the starting line up.

the injured list was as follows!
wellens
flannery
price
scott moore
clough
wheeler
dixon
lomax
gaskell

these ARE in the Saints 1st team 17 starters . And yes some are the kids but they are our 1st team line up,

Wheeler, Dixon, Lomax and Gaskell are all back up players. The other 5 I agree. Your first choice halves would be Pryce/Eastmond and so the likes of Wheeler/Lomas/Gaskell would not be first choice.

If all those play in your first 17 which nine would miss out from yesterday?

Only Wellens, Flannery and Pryce are 1st team starters if everyone is fit and available, stop exaggerating the rest are back up players.

in case you haven't heard Eastmond was only playing because lomax was injured and is on his way out to the girlie game, As for Price he hasn't played more than 7 games in the last 2 years and is more than likely on his way out at the end of the year , so i repeat these kids are our first team starters.

I am sure that most St. Helens supporters would not agree but many people may hold the view that nine first teamers being out was made equal by having Steve Ganson as the match referee.

So I'll ask again if you include your nine players that you listed which, nine would be omitted from yesterdays game?

At the start of the season had everyone been fit Pryce and Eastmond would have played 6/7, don't try to kid yourself otherwise.

The penalty was given, get over it!!!!!

No doubt Hull will get a dodgy call that goes in their favour this season. But to give up an 18 point lead is sacrilage...

If you re watch the VT in slomo washy actually gets both hands on the boll for a split second before its bumped out of his grasp....
stupid shout from the ganson show , all teams have to suffer him but he isnt the worst

There is a photo of the players going for the ball in the HDM both
players are jumping for the ball both players feet are off the ground plus Washy has his back to the Saints player and his arms are raised to catch the ball

You obviously have never seen me play then!!!

Could have been given either way. What is more narking is that if it had been the other way around with saints chasing their own drop out I reckon they would have been given the benefit of the doubt and play on.

Why was he reffing this game?? There wasn't any other superleague games on Monday. Any of the other refs could have (Should have) been the ref. It stops the controversy!

The RFL knew Saints wanted some help for this game fact