Fine, but Brough would take time grow into the position, as would any player coming in. You've written Tuimivave off after three and a half games in the position plus you maintain he had pre season at centre. Pretty sure it was mentioned he'd trained at six and Abdul at loose man. Heyho, AP and Radford seem to know what they're at.
Our pack when fully fit is better than any other, Knockers team selection looks to me like it can do the job. I would go with Hadley starting at loose man, he is the quiet man of our side, he had an excellent game when picked at stand off in a late change, recently. We need to be quick off the mark, no daft penalties, wear them down, keep the pressure on for the full 80, tall order, I know but "I Bel13ve" we can do it, but I'm a glass almost full, type of supporter.

Bumpy's bench selection is sickening. Imagine being the opposition & seeing that lot coming on after 20 minutes of being smashed about by Ellis, Taylor, Mini & Watts.

Hadley, as I've put before, I think is more suited to starting rather than providing impact off the bench.

It's a difficult decision whether to go with Washy in the 17 or not. I think Radford will put him in, but can see the reasons for leaving him out tomorrow.

A couple of typo's due to being on a small screen phone, hardly a crime, certainly not one to instigate insults



Your example of Brough is flawed. As good a player as he can be, he can also be a disruptive dummy spitter who can break team spirit and become a decent machine. Also, Huddersfields position and performances overall suggests that Brough impact has not been as great as you suggest.

You have singled out CT before he has been given a decent run on the team at 6.

The real reason Bonaire is singling out CT, is due to his continued hatred for Yeamo



CT to the centres means displacing Yeaman (as Griffin will have one of the spots nailed down), hence Bonaire doesn't want to even think about CT playing at 6 and the subsequent thought of Yeaman still being played at centre. It makes him feel sick. New 6, CT to centre, Yeaman released is his thinking.

Surely not? Even Bonaire must appreciate Yeamo's improvement this year. Anyhow, Pryce not in the 19, so Radders must have faith in Tuimavave(spell check this time)

I can't wait for this one. Warrington edge it on paper but if we turn up then they are on for a tough time.

Can you still pay on the gate at theirs? And does anyone have any parking advice, I usually train it.

Suggest you get your facts correct
Carlos Tuimavave trained all pre season as a left centre and started the season in that position.
I like Carlos as a player but his best position is at left centre on the shoulder of Pritchard

WOW thats some theory
Lets make it simple for you,i am not singling out Carlos Tuimavave.I like the player but for me his best position is at left centre where he has more open field to run and use his attacking flair.He also works well with Pritchard.
Simple as that, nothing to do with Yeaman.
Radford had the foresight to see Carlos as a centre and thats where he trained all pre season.
A 6 is a priority for the club if we are to step up another level.

It was always Hulls intention to play Carlos at 6 next year.

To be fair, Easthull fc said only a couple of weeks ago, he was always going to be

I'd take what Easthullfc says with a pinch of salt.

I rate Hadley but I think Washy's utility value is vital to a strong bench. A back or Houghton goes down and we're fooked without him.

Shaul
Talanoa
Yeaman
Fonua
Michaels
Carlos
Sneyd
Taylor
Houghton
Watts
Mini
Manu
Ellis

Washy
Pritchard
Bowden
Thompson

Same team as I put up



Have to say its been a very very long time, infact don't think I've ever known a time that you looked at a Hull FC team and thought Feck me (in good way) at the interchanges.

I think Hadley has more pace, is a slightly better tackler and better footwork than Washy, i personally think he's being very underused since he came on the scene and needed to be really pushed hard as an individual.

Going with that starting 13 and the 4 on the bench is just an intent of all out warfare, whilst the halves can do their stuff if there is a dominant pack then that usually sets up how things go overall. Smash them from minute one, keep on smashing them with the rotation and like any side under a lot of pressure mentally & physically heads can drop, that Wakey/Wigan result was a prime example.
It's all great in theory but come the day I think we would be massively dissapointed if Warrington win by anything more than a score as we are certainly more than capable of dominating in the forwards at least.

I'd also back the Carlos was always deemed to be a left centre, he played there throughout the friendlies and with Michaels on his wing they smashed it up against the dobbins. However things change, IF JA was thought of a possible suitor for the 6 jersey then that seems to have gone out the window, and with yeaman having improved this year, Fonua getting better/recovered from his injury, Logan still in the background and now signing Griffin that points to a change of direction for CT and if he's happy to move to 6 and can prove he has what it takes then I'm fine with that. I agree that on what I've seen he's a better talent at left centre than a 6, that's not to say he can't grow into that position more and he has played there in the NRL but IF I had a choice I'd prefer him as a ball handling/elusive centre than another bash em up style which Griffin is.

Given our tight budget after signing Griffin we'd be lucky to have anything more in the cap to sign anyone other than a no-name project so I personally can't see anymore changes for next year other than cover which in all fairness should be coming from the junior squad members anyway, if it aint broke why fix it as they say.

Yep good post . Hopefully next year Logan can push for a place as the kid defo has talent

He was only meant to be left centre it's what he was originally signed for, 2017s off half target didn't come off, so we are going with Carlos.

My concern is we are now entering the business end of the season with Carlos at 6 who is work in progress and we are not as fluent as when Pryce is on his game
I really liked him at left centre for his attacking vision as he had a lot more space to work in to use his footwork,deceptive pace,good passer of the ball and always alert to Pritchards breaks and offloads.
I understand we cant sign everyone we target but its disappointing if we cant find that elusive 6 after knowing all this time a 6 is needed when other clubs seem to be able to find them.
If its now a matter of finance because we signed Griffin then surely a new half back acquisition was more of a priority than a centre.

Pryce does have the experience but not half the speed Carlos has,he is a total athlete which is what's needed in the "running 6 position" our club see enough in him to fill the 6 shirt so I believe they will get it right, the target has turned us down, & we have gone with plan B & brought in griffin, he's a good age with experience with goal kicking experience, I would rather us go with this then sign a half back like Gaskell or any other pivot that is just kicking around, the position is not the main organiser but just a running threat with an eye to spot weak defenders & know when to go or not with a little bit of a kick on him, Carlos will go just fine, we was wanting dean & Abdul in over pryce before his capture, we missed paea,westy & the pig, we have done well without them so far, I trust the club will have made the right choices yet again.

I'll bow to your expert knowledge regards Tuimavave training at centre. We have signed Griffin as centre, the owner, coach and Motu have obviously plumped for Carlos to be our stand off, what's the problem, go with it. The time to gripe, is if it goes tits up. Most fans of other clubs are waiting, or hoping for our bubble to burst, me, I'm enjoying the best ride for ten years.

Quote ="bonaire"Talking of glasses its seems by your senseless reply you have had too many already this evening I am not singling out any of our team i am referring to the impact the half backs named have on their teams when fit. Its my opinion that to take this team to the next level we need a top 6. The example is when Brough is playing for Huddersfield they are a very good side.Take out Brough like last week and they are not he same team. Put Danny Brough into our team and we go up another level'" On Carlos, he's played primarily at 6 from what I can gather. He was awarded off half of the year in the NRL U20s competition in 2011. And 2012. He captained the junior kiwis at 6. He sees himself as a 6 and prefers playing there to centre i.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/88590 ... -at-centre I'm not denying Radford saw him as a centre but maybe in training they've seen something that suggests he's worth a go here; Radford has described him as a "pivot by trade". On Brough, yes, he's important to Huddersfield as any primary halfback is. Like Sneyd is for us, in fact.

Quote ="bonaire"Talking of glasses its seems by your senseless reply you have had too many already this evening I am not singling out any of our team i am referring to the impact the half backs named have on their teams when fit. Its my opinion that to take this team to the next level we need a top 6. The example is when Brough is playing for Huddersfield they are a very good side.Take out Brough like last week and they are not he same team. Put Danny Brough into our team and we go up another level'" On Carlos, he's played primarily at 6 from what I can gather. He was awarded off half of the year in the NRL U20s competition in 2011. And 2012. He captained the junior kiwis at 6. He sees himself as a 6 and prefers playing there to centre i.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/88590 ... -at-centre I'm not denying Radford saw him as a centre but maybe in training they've seen something that suggests he's worth a go here; Radford has described him as a "pivot by trade". On Brough, yes, he's important to Huddersfield as any primary halfback is. Like Sneyd is for us, in fact.

Not necessary just check the Carlos Tuimavave interview on HFC LIve if its still available as it was the beginning of the season

Didn't we shoehorn Carlos into the centre position in the first place?
My understanding was that he was a half back primarily, but we signed him to do a job at centre.
Maybe the coaching staff have seen enough of him now to know he can make the position his own.
I was hoping for a star half back coming in, but Griffin at centre (good signing) and Carlos to stand off could be a net gain.
Still need numbers at half back for cover though.

Quote ="Irregular Hoops"Didn't we shoehorn Carlos into the centre position in the first place? My understanding was that he was a half back primarily, but we signed him to do a job at centre. Maybe the coaching staff have seen enough of him now to know he can make the position his own. I was hoping for a star half back coming in, but Griffin at centre (good signing) and Carlos to stand off could be a net gain. Still need numbers at half back for cover though.'" And yet every single article at time of his signing -HDM/SKY, including a write up by Dan Tomlinson says he'll be playing centre. The Yorkshire Post mentions LR saying he is seen as being a centre and CT says "Hopefully I can keep building as the weeks go on. I can play a few positions but I have been training mainly at centre.” www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... z4B8MPfdEs A change of mind is fine, CT played 6 at Int junior level but was obviously not deemed good enough for the NRL even at Warriors/Newcastle and ended up playing centre certainly in the games I saw him last year half a dozen games. He's 24 now and including the games for us has a total of 25 first team games under his belt (14 games in 3 years of NRL). He looked handy as I stated when we signed him, so why he was never considered more or got more games earlier in his career despite his auspicious start as a top 10 world junior we won't really know, let's hope he can do the business but I think expectation is high for someone with relatively little game experience in a very pivotal role.

Quote ="Irregular Hoops"Didn't we shoehorn Carlos into the centre position in the first place? My understanding was that he was a half back primarily, but we signed him to do a job at centre. Maybe the coaching staff have seen enough of him now to know he can make the position his own. I was hoping for a star half back coming in, but Griffin at centre (good signing) and Carlos to stand off could be a net gain. Still need numbers at half back for cover though.'" And yet every single article at time of his signing -HDM/SKY, including a write up by Dan Tomlinson says he'll be playing centre. The Yorkshire Post mentions LR saying he is seen as being a centre and CT says "Hopefully I can keep building as the weeks go on. I can play a few positions but I have been training mainly at centre.” www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... z4B8MPfdEs A change of mind is fine, CT played 6 at Int junior level but was obviously not deemed good enough for the NRL even at Warriors/Newcastle and ended up playing centre certainly in the games I saw him last year half a dozen games. He's 24 now and including the games for us has a total of 25 first team games under his belt (14 games in 3 years of NRL). He looked handy as I stated when we signed him, so why he was never considered more or got more games earlier in his career despite his auspicious start as a top 10 world junior we won't really know, let's hope he can do the business but I think expectation is high for someone with relatively little game experience in a very pivotal role.

Got to win tonight, if we lose & Catalan beat saints tomorrow which I think they will, we could slip to third place possibly fourth if Wigan beat kr by a big score & we got beat by a big score.