It's customary on this board to quote the post that you're arguing against and not some other one. That way it's easier for people to follow your thread - so to speak. Is your name Charlie as well ? It's just that you're all appearing like a right bunch of them to me.

Agree with all the above. We are more than capable of winning this game but need to take the changes we are creating rather than blowing them. For all their injuries we also have our fair share but still think if we play sensible intelligent rugby and play for 80mins we should be able to take the 2pts.

Still can't understand how they got the penalty for that incident

Eh?

What a strange thing to 'say' I didnt realise that a pre requisite for posting was to win SL and to bring your own mortality into it....

The typo was a 'cheap shot' admittedly so sorry.

Thanks for clearing the rest of your non argument up though, blimey some posters think this and some posters think that whatever next?

I'm cut to the quick by your rapier wit.

in Charlie's defence (go on I'll give you another chance) 'the proper Charlie', he did use your post with the article rather than Wilde3's.

It's a leap of faith i know, but, he gave you the benefit of the doubt

We are under strength, we have 5 first teamers missing, all a shoe in for the 17. I don't think we have a paper thin squad though.

Apology accepted. However, you know what they say about sarcasm.

It's not a very good idea though is it ? I mean who's to say that everyone reads every post in a thread before posting their own thoughts ? Maybe people see a direct answer to their post and feel the need to reply at that time ? Or even worse maybe Wilde3 is on my foe list and I never even saw his/her post? Our Chas would have been better quoting both posts wouldn't he ? But Chas is OK - he's not the one complaining.

Do you have a big nose by the way ?

"foe list" are you 'avin' a laugh?

Whether I've a big nose or not, pardon me for getting 'involved' on a thread entitled Warrington Game. Additionally, as you say above, "Maybe people see a direct answer to their post and feel the need to reply at that time"?

I must however bid you farewell I really will miss your muppetry

Touched a nerve there I think - confirms the big nose theory.

Anyway

Hearing they will be no Holdsworth tomorrow, for once I hope the source is wrong.

Oh FFS

Heremaia at SH, Houghton the full 80, then.

Seymour is in the 19. he'll get the nod.

Agree....

Would go with that if its true about Holdsworth.

Isn't the whole point in having a good squad that you don't have to move players from their usual position to cover an injury? Seymour straight swap for DJ for me. Leave Heremaia on the bench coming on at hooker were he's been great this season bringing flair off the bench.

Fubar'd without holdsworth. Hope it's not true

Hope October is long enough for you to do all the things in life you wanted then. What a daft thing to say / type. I'm taking my ball home

We won't beat Wire without Holdsworth, big blow if he's out.

Bet cha 5 bob

If Holdsworth is out then it's got to be Seymour, there's no point moving Heremaia from hooker where he's been outstanding this season to scrum half where he's never really excelled. Seymour has to start, and who knows, it could be the kick start to his FC career?

What you should have said if your pointing to playing without a player is; "We won't beat the Wire who are playing without their captain Morley, Briers, Westwood, Harrison & Bridge as we're without Holdsworth". Granted Big Gareth is out for you too and Tess is also missing I believe. Looking forward to this today. I think it will be a fairly even game and there won't be much between us. Have a safe trip all who are traveling and may the Wire win

I actually agree with you. However good a player is, he is still only one out of seventeen. He will be missed, obviously, but someone will still be playing in that position. Game on!!