I think the ban for Savelio is harsh tbh. He sticks a leg out but also grabs at him at the same time. You are allowed to use your legs so long as you have a hand on the player. He was wrong footed and it was just a bit of a lunge. Maybe just a warning about technique would have sufficed. He wouldn't have played anyway though, so it's irrelevant I suppose.

It’s unbelievable, the Salford game had Houghton Dudson Carlos Savelio all cautioned for it in the same game.

Day trippers maybe

The new Fab Four?

He was cited twice wasn’t he.

I was of the opinion Sevelio fell on fell on his and in so doing accidentally tripped opponent?

Hey I didn’t put booty! It !

Lol we know what you meant, a bit unfair on Savelio but as Mr Zucchini says it ended up irrelevant.

Late today, but nothing to worry about. Rovers might not agree. https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 202019.pdf Ellis mentioned 3 times, but no charges.

Late today, but nothing to worry about. Rovers might not agree. https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 202019.pdf Ellis mentioned 3 times, but no charges.

Quote ="ccs"Late today, but nothing to worry about. Rovers might not agree. https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 202019.pdf Ellis mentioned 3 times, but no charges. '" looking at that full list, we may as well be playing touch rugby.

Quote ="ccs"Late today, but nothing to worry about. Rovers might not agree. https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 202019.pdf Ellis mentioned 3 times, but no charges. '" looking at that full list, we may as well be playing touch rugby.

You've been very quiet this weekend bumpy, not a mention of the Catalan's game, despite your 600 posts in less than 3 months.
The result must have really upset you.

Bumpy?

I was very happy with the Catalans result thanks.

Good news on Ellis. Wonder whether he'll play though if we've a few back, massive shift last Saturday.

I would like to see Radford tell him he isnt playing think he will really want this game.

Not playing Ellis would be sheer lunacy!

Ellis will play friday but not monday

Well, the little monkeys met yesterday, nothing to worry though...… https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 0April.pdf Paea's NFA made me chuckle.... Quote Player raises knee as ball carrier and brings the knee back down prior to contact. Player does not make contact on opponent'" Luke Thompson is charged with raising the knee the tackle, given a zero match penalty notice, and the reason given, well there isn't one.

Well, the little monkeys met yesterday, nothing to worry though...… https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 0April.pdf Paea's NFA made me chuckle.... Quote Player raises knee as ball carrier and brings the knee back down prior to contact. Player does not make contact on opponent'" Luke Thompson is charged with raising the knee the tackle, given a zero match penalty notice, and the reason given, well there isn't one.

Quote ="ccs"Well, the little monkeys met yesterday, nothing to worry though...… https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 0April.pdf Paea's NFA made me chuckle.... Luke Thompson is charged with raising the knee the tackle, given a zero match penalty notice, and the reason given, well there isn't one.'" Sure I saw a bit of tripping in the Cas game, maybe it was the legal sort

Quote ="ccs"Well, the little monkeys met yesterday, nothing to worry though...… https://secure.rugby-league.com/ign_doc ... 0April.pdf Paea's NFA made me chuckle.... Luke Thompson is charged with raising the knee the tackle, given a zero match penalty notice, and the reason given, well there isn't one.'" Sure I saw a bit of tripping in the Cas game, maybe it was the legal sort

They obviously watch the matches in great detail. With regards to Mitch Garbutt:

"Player reaches to make tackle on opponent. Makes contact
on the lower jaw of opponent. Onfield penalty sufficient."

The referee didn't award a penalty. Sneyd played the ball after a short delay....

Seems to of gone to minimal sentence here where in Auss gone to maximum , you have to penalize bad practice.

secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf Luke Thompson gets NFA for raised knees (again).

secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf Luke Thompson gets NFA for raised knees (again).

Quiet again..... secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf Quote ="Hit Man Ellis"Player makes contact over the shoulder of opponent, footage does not demonstrate contact to head or neck. Player is reasonable in approach to contact.'"

Quiet again..... secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf Quote ="Hit Man Ellis"Player makes contact over the shoulder of opponent, footage does not demonstrate contact to head or neck. Player is reasonable in approach to contact.'"

Quote ="ccs"Quiet again..... secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf '" So he got sin-binned for a hit to the shoulder? Always thought those were worse than head shots....

Quote ="ccs"Quiet again..... secure.rugby-league.com/ign_docs ... 202019.pdf '" So he got sin-binned for a hit to the shoulder? Always thought those were worse than head shots....

Just can't go messing around with shots to the shoulder, dangerous stuff.

The previous poster said over the shoulder, it looked pretty bad from where we were sat in the South Stand.

It states “footage shows no contact with neck or head”