Some of us have work and family commitments.

OK talking the talk about young players, but I've yet to see this in practice yet.

He could have played Hookem against Toulouse, we still would have won easily or he could have kept him at Whitehavem, but he did neither.

Reynolds has no ability but still gets picked.

Not had a bad career though has he , with no ability ! Getting boring now regards hookem and the Toulouse game !

Instead of trying to be clever why don't you enlighten us and actually back up what you've based your opinion on other than repeating the same rhetoric, as in all honesty on this subject you seem to come across as a WUM rather than offering any rationale instead trying to deride others with presumption and assumption.

As Dave K has said its one thing talking about things, but its another thing to actually do them.

I know Bonaire gets and cops a lot of flack for their posts which is a mixed bag for me as some I agree with and others I don't, however at least Bonaire gives the reasoning or a thought process behind the opinion posted.

Now he has no ability, is that too hard to understand, too many injurys, he is finished.

If you don't like what I say, easy to block me, you have no answers to anyone's points.

It’s boring because it’s constant hookem in the team blah blah blah , should have played against Toulouse etc ….. he didn’t so move on . Like I said. Back the coaching team , they know more than us and see the players daily .

My take on it and there isn't a right or wrong on the subject is that hookem isn't progressing as well as BH hoped he would , maybe the injuries have affected him but the fact that we were happy with Whitehaven to play him at 9 could suggest that halfback might not be the position the coaches see for him in the future. Dissapointing that he hasn't been in any 17 this season but I can understand if Reynolds and gale are available then they play,we so need them to start getting a connection on the pitch

I wouldnt mind giving Gale and Reynolds a few games together as long as it means we can get Johnstone out of the 17 and inject some pace at 9.

I have said this for ages about Hodgson and also that he is too loyal to certain senior players but the posse on here will never agree.
Whats the betting he drops Connor Wynne and replaces him with Griffin.

Another smart Chris, not worth replying to half of them

So Hodgson says he's ready, but no it's just people copying others opinions

Il hold my hand up, I agree with Hodgsons words and that's he's ready and should play hahahaha!!!!!!

Anyways moving on from windy winger.......

All you can wish for is Hodgson plays players on form. Would of like to of seen Mitch make this game as he's been amazing, any updates on if he's getting a new deal, as he's arguably one of our form players.

Looking forward to attending the game, looking like theyl be a bumper crowd

How can he be one of our form players , if he’s not playing!

That is one massive chip you have on your soldier.

Don’t get so upset because the majority don’t agree with your overall opinion of Griffin’s time at FC.

If you actually read what people put you will see most agree, yes AGREE, with you that Griffin is well down the pecking order for a centre spot.

You do know he could have dropped Wynne last week for Griffin but didn’t? No need to mention it every week because if Wynne doesn’t improve he will deserve dropping.

He's still on the "not yet determined" list. Interestingly though, Lovodua isn't which means his future has been decided. Maybe an announcement tomorrow?

[urlhttps://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/rfl-off-contract-list-players-24019948[/url

Was one of our form players before he was injured playing for the Army.
Thats what he means.Why try and be clever?

Whats a soldier?
You seriously think i get upset about the posse not agreeing with my comments about Griffin or any posts i make.
Why would Hodgson drop Wynne last week for Griffin when he has been one of our two form centres?
Then if as you say most agree that Griffin is well down the pecking order for the left centre spot will it surprise you if Hodgson drops Wynne and plays Griffin despite his lazy attitude against Saints.

Cheers, I suppose alot depends on his army commitments, they could make it slightly more complicated, love the player though, good honest work rate and so strong in defence. Kick chase is phenomenonal too

I’d be tempted to try Connor Wynne at six, think he’d be dynamite.

Gale and Reynolds. Wouldn't be my choice but it must work at some point, right? Right?

At least we might get to see Lovadua at hooker anyway.

Hopefully Lovodua finally getting a run out at 9. Let's see what he can do from there.

Come on lads listening in the sun, let’s have them reminded early they are in a cup final next Saturday.

Get in Jake

Come on boysssss

Get in Jake now kick the goal man

Ffs Gale