i think headingly is certainly holding leeds back. given the citys population their crowds are poor.

huddersfield with zero real success on the field have grown their crowds every year.

of course if you think halving your average crowds is progress, good luck to you

shhhh

Raggy likes it in his own (padded) world.

What an absolute nonsense! Chelseas crowds are poor in comparison to the population and they have a sy ground. And how is Headingly holding Leeds back? They are solvent and are the current World Champions.

We could put mannequins in them

you are comparing stampford bridge to either the boulevarde or headingly

Like I said, padded world!

Probably never even set foot in the royal borough either, just read once about the Kings Road.

wtf?

Poor in comparison to the population of where, exactly?




If they had a better ground, they'd be Masters of the Universe.

and the thing is the KC is probably one of the best grounds in the world which a RL clubs plays at.

ive been to suncorp stadium and thats brilliant. most of the sydeny grounds are average, and the Kc is probably the best in SL, or at least on par with wigan and hudds.

and with a poor team the crowds are 13,000 - 14,000.

What was more amusing is the fact you stated Leeds are being held back

No I wasn't actually, I was showing that having a nice all seater stadium and success doesn't guarantee packed attendances. That was the point.

Don't see why I need to explain myself to a jumped up keyboard warrior like you but my cousin lives in Kensington and I have seen Chelsea v Wimbledon at Stamford Bridge. You may claim to be well traveled but it certainly doesn't give any credibility to your arguments.

despite FCs crowds doubling when moving from the boulevarde to the KC?

You seen Doncasters crowds recently?

All your arguments and points are worthless due to the simple fact you still do not know the name of our spiritual home. For your info it is spelt BOULEVARD

talk about avoiding the issue.

wakey would beg to have a council like yours.

It's as relevant as you bringing up Suncorp.

I remember, but it was back in the 1980's when the rest of the ground could hear it

I thank you,

You have just backed my point.

And to think, you are one of those who actually lobbies the point about owning a stake in Hull FC. God forbid the day.


You seem to like living in the past, judging by your by passing of the 1990's and early 2000's with regard to the Boulevard atmosphere.

Since 1998/9. Manchester United have not (on a consistant basis) trained on the Old Trafford Pitch. Their reserves could well have played the odd game their, but as far as I am aware, their reserves, are not the ones who have since lifted the premier league, FA cup, League cup and Champions League. They normally play their games at places like Stockport and Maccelsfield (et al). A little bit like Liverpool use the Halliwell Jones every now and then or that Leeds Untied use Belle Vue from time to time (or they did until very recently.

At what point could you be @r$ed to read the original post without spurting out more drivel? An open training session! Do you think they let them in for nothing? COMMERCIAL REASONS!

If you take your head out of your anus, and read what you put in the first place "we get no home advantage as we are only allowed to train on the pitch once a week", you will realise that training on the pitch is not the home advantage you make it out to be, as the examples of Man Utd (plus other football clubs) proves.

For spiritual home read "Change is not good"

FFS Hull FC didn't even start out at The Boulevard.

And for the record, your arguements and points are worthless as you cannot back up a single one of them due to your blinkered hatred of the board.

He knows the name, he just can't spell it properly

and the thing people are forgetting is the BOULEVARD is unlikely to pass the franchise criteria anyway.

if the club did want to move back there, not that they would, would they even be granted a license?

maybe if Hull FC dropped the price of season tickets to what huddersfield are charging they would have 15,000 season ticket holders and average crowds of 20,000, then the atmosphere would be fantastic.

whenever you see large numbers of empty seats at game, i think the price of tickets is too high.

why dont the club offer existing season tickholders a 20% or 30% discount off their season ticket if they bring in a new ST holder.

Man U reserves play at Bury
By the way, is your sig As the Worm Turns?