ignore the idiot, the hearing isn't until tomorrow and it's a Grade A offence, Bailey got 3 matches, Tomkins got nothing.

Watched it back, the prat had awarded a penalty and McGoldrick hadn't realised , thought L**ds were playing the ball.

totally unjust from the RFL, but what else do we expect.

Will the referee get cited for being useless?

Have you got a link confirming he's be given a 1 match ban?

He hasn't, he's been charged which means it will go to a hearing where they will decide the punishment.

It's either going to be NFA or 1 match.

The way you lot were moaning about him signing I would have thought you would be hoping for a 10 match ban.

He was one of our best players on Friday, read into that what you like!

It happen in the 47 minute of the game .the charge carry's a 1 match ban if proven He has been charged

its a ban he don't play for Leeds its a ban!!
It just sums up what a joke our sport is. nothing in it at all if its the bit im thinking of.

Ok the hearing is tomorrow but my statement was based on:

a) It's McGoldrick (plenty of previous)

b) he does not play for Wigan or Leeds

Nothing in it at all, not even worth the petrol money down to Red Hall, but this is the RFL we are talking about so i expect McGoldrick to get a match ban for absolutely nothing.

what a bloomin joke

If he gets a one match ban at least he could have made it worth while and floored the smug tw*t.

Did anyone see him while he was waiting for the players to come out

he had a look on his face you could have slapped

Bailey got 3 games

But with our lack of players, We need anyone at the moment!

Webb gets a warning that is what Ryan should get not even that nothing in it.
lets see what happens i reckon ban.

Looks innocuous to me, he is clearly trying to get to the man with the ball.

Nothing in it.

Yeah, unfortunately we are not the RFL.

I cannot see anything in it.

May be just me, but if I was a player in that game, i wouldn't accidentally push him, I'd wipe the floor with him.

When I watched the game on sky, and they was all in the tunnel, i said to the lass look at that ref, he had a right cheeky grin, and i think he looked at goldie or a hull player, rewind it back.

How many did Mcdonnell get for breaking a refs leg?

To me these incidents should result in a charge for the referee not the other way round.

'Poor positioning resulting in obstruction of a player from the defending team, thus putting yourself in danger and interfering with the game'

If only the rfl had the balls to do it!

Completely different it wasn't deliberate contact, still caused by poor referee positioning though.

Personally not that bothered if he gets a ban, would rather play Russell.

I wouldn't....

Goldie played very well and was our better player on Friday.

He was safe with the ball, his positioning was great, and he returned the ball strongly and made good field position.

Russel has his positives over Goldie, being young, much quicker. But at the moment I would rather just have someone that can do a sound job, solidly, without any real weakness' Russel's negatives out weigh the positives i'm afraid, and it's because he's inexperienced.

Goldie has a lot of experience, and it's what's needed at the moment to settle the ship.

Not McGoldricks biggest fan but he had a very good game on friday and as for Russell.....he can go back to wigan for me...the fact that they havent re-called him and played someone else at fullback the other week speaks volumes to me.