Eddie is such a tool!!

clarkey just predicted us to win grand final and be the team of 2010

very wise man is that clarky

Clarky

Clarky

Clarky





He is a boring git, but he certainly knows his stuff





Stevo predicted us a top 4 finish and winning the challenge cup (forget which paper)....I can't flippin sleep

Oh yes you are an expert, what did you post on the VT during the play-off's about the Hudd v Cat match

I know I've used this already, but...

Think it was something like that down there

smell the fear

I've always liked him.

Never thought about it, but the more I think about it he has a certain appeal

You mean the game where I backed the Catalans on the handicap and won rather alot of money.

Yes it was marvellous thank you




And just not cursing it on here was superb, as i've said if you'd seen my posts on the football forum you'd understand

Course you did

Some people in life are just soooooooooooooo transparent

I did I believe you'll find I told you the same thing on a thread on the rovers board. But typical woman, you never listen.

Strange how people create these stories to cover some terrible predictions and quotes.

Yep typical women....I can spot a bullsh**ter a mile off

I have created nothing but I don't expect or particulally care whether you believe me or not.

Obviously not or you wouldn't be applauing Mr Clarke

Clarke gave his opinion he was not bullsh**ing whereas you made a point about a game and then backtracked when you saw your quote on a sig.

Nothing before the game alluded to you having a bet on Catalans.

Now if Clarke says (assuming we dont win GF or get any where near) later that he was just joking about Hull then he too can be classed as a bullsh**er as well.

Gosh I am loving this...



do you not know when to give up, clearly not

What am I giving up, you either believe me or you don't. I certainly won't be laying awake fretting over it

OWNED

Walk away mate, its getting messy !!!

Quite correct, you have been

As fascinating as this conversation has been, could we possibly get back to something at least approximating the original topic?

Ta much.