All them putting Washy at 13 need there heads checking , we all know who will play there if Fitz doesnt

Radford. Great stuff.

1. Tansey
2. Whiting
3. Turner
4. Yeaman
5. Briscoe
6. Horne
7. Berrigan
8. Dowes
9. Houghton
10. Cusack
11. Manu
12. Tickle
13. Radford

14. Washbrook
15. Hall
16. Hame
17. Moa

I would be stunned if Agar picked a different line-up to that.

If Fitz is out then I would imagine that will be Agar's selection.

1 Tansey
2 Calderwood
3 Yeamo
4 Briscoe
5 Hall
6 Whiting
7 Webster
8 Dowes
9 Berro
10 Radders
11 Tickle
12 Fitz
13 Washy

14 Houghton
15 Manu
16 Luakai
17 Turner(though close call with Yeamo)

1. Tansey
2. Calderwood
3. Whiting
4. Yeaman
5. Briscoe
6. Horne
7. Berrigan
8. Dowes
9. Houghton
10. O'Meley Or Cusack
11. Manu
12. Tickle
13. Fitz

14. Washbrook
15. Radford or Cusack
16. Hame
17. Moa
I'd leave Turner out because I still think his defence is not up to scratch and Whiting is steady and clever with the ball.

That will be it.

I'm sorry but pivotal LF and Danny Washbrook doesn't work as a sentence.

Whats up with Fitz?

Nothing..

So no-one picking him then....is Fitz the new Blacklock







FWIT My team

1.Tansey
2.Calderwood
3.Whiting/Hall
4.Yeaman
5.Briscoe
6.Horne
7.Berrigan
8.Dowes
9.Houghton
10.Cusack
11.Manu
12.Tickle
13.Fitz

14.Hall/Whiting
15.moa
16.Lauaki
17.Radford.

Why are most people dropping Turner...he has gone well lately, he scored on Saturday.

So the fact he scored means he should play?

Wakeys 1st 2 trys came down his side as well.

For me...he isnt nothing special,he is a steady player and i think we have too many of them in the team.I will most probably get shot down but thats how i see him.Mind you if he plays Thurs and rips cockends head off he will be my all time favourite

He has managed to make Yeamo look average ( and I am a fan of Yeamo

)...his defensive work is more solid than Halls, and some-thing tell me we are going to need to defend of Thursday

1.Whiting
2.Calderwood
3.Turner
4.Hall
5.Briscoe
6.Horne
7.Tansey
8.Dowes
9.Houghton
10.Radford
11.Manu
12.Tickle
13.Fitz

14.Berrigan
15.Moa
16.Lauaki
17.Cusack

Obviously it wont be that but that would be my team.

Probably best of a bad job. If moa isn't fit (and assuming fitz is), I'd play fitz in the 2nd row and washbrook at 13. His defence could be important on the night. As you say though, won't happen and we'll probably persevere with berrigan at 7 even though it's never worked in all the games he's played there for us

Very frustrating that we lose one player and have to move so many players around to accomodate

Thats what happens with no Plan B.Although im still not sure what Plan A is

never going to happen but-

1 Whiting
2 Calderwood
3 Turner
4 Yeaman
5 Briscoe
6 Berrigan
7 Tansey
8 Radford
9 Houghton
10 Fitz
11 Manu
12 Tickle
13 Washbrook

14 Moa
15 Lauaki
16 Horne
17 Burnett

Why is nobody picking Horne to play at Hooker?!!

Agar will !

1 : Tansey
2 : Calderwood
3 : Turner
4 : Yeaman
5 : Briscoe
6 : Horne
7 : Berrigan
8 : Dowes
9 : Houghton
10 : Cusack
11 : Tickle
12 : Manu
13 : Fitzgibbon

14 : Moa
15 : Luakai
16 : Radford
17 : Whiting

??????? Thought salary cap would prevent this

1. Whiting
2. Calderwood
3. Turner
4. Yeaman
5. Briscoe
6. Horne
7. Tansey
8. Dowes
9. Houghton
10. O'Meley


11. Manu
12. Tickle
13. Fitz

14. Berrigan
15. Radford
16. Lauaki
17. Washbrook

1) Tansey
2) Calderwood
3) Turner or hall (didnt turner go off injured saturday)
4) Yeaman
5) Briscoe
6) Horne
7) Whiting
8 ) Moa or Cusack
9) Houghton
10) Dowes
11) Manu
12) Tickle
13) Radford

14) Moa
15) Washy
16) Lauaki
17) Hall

Not according to Agar in his interview after the game, he just thought as we were chasing the game that Hall offered more in an attacking sense.

do you know something