Fair play to you for having an opinion. Too many people are still slating Agar regarding Hall and but then criticising Hall for being poor. I have to admit I am starting to think the same about Hall, I expected more from him this season but he is not delivering which is a shame.

In fairness to Agar he never played much at fullback and only had a maybe one game at stand off. His confidence was shot I will admit but then again we are gtting told the same about his confidence this season and he has had plenty of opportunities at centre.

I have not said that but at the moment has has offered nothing in the centres in both attack and defence and apart from a promising first game at 6 he has done little there either. I questioned his signing at the time, I don't think he is going to be good enough, we should have signed Ratchford or certainly be looking too.

I'm not one of those who thinks Agar is to blame for [ieverything[/i. I don't like the direction he's taking our club in and I'd like to see the back of him as soon as possible, but he can't be held [itotally[/i responsible for the form (or lack thereof) of individual players. O'Meley, Manu and Whiting are all playing consistently well under the same coach as Hall.

Excellent point.

Well said!

May not be a bad idea.

1 Tansey
2 Whiting
3 Turner
4 Yeaman
5 T. Briscoe
6 Nicklas
7 Long

8 Dowes
9 Houghton
10 O'Meley
11 Tickle
12 Fitzgibbon
13 Washbrook

14 McShane
15 Burnett
16 Radford
17 Moa

On Monday I will ask R Agar about that ..He is a guest speaker along with J Rule at a meeting If they get back from France without delay

Turner at centre is a good option as can't afford to take a chance with Hall giving the ball away or running out the line in defence, would play Radford in the Second Row for 25 mins and Prop for 25 mins so Cunningham only needs to play 20 mins

1, Tansey
2, Whiting
3, Turner
4, Yemo
5, Briscoe
6, Washbrook
7, Long
8, O'Meley
9, Houghton
10, Moa
11, Tickle
12, Burnett
13, Fitz,
14, Radford
15, Dowes
16, Mcshane,
17, Cunningham

turner at centre i think now.start of the season i was saying hall,but with his defence the way it is at the mo',turner is the better option.but i'm not mr agar!

Wont happen but!!

Tansey
Turner
Yeaman
Hall
Briscoe
Whiting
Long
O'Meley
Houghton
Radford
Tickle
Fitzgibbon
Washbrook

Moa
Dowes
Burnett
McShane

Play Whiting at 6, good decision maker.

Hall at left centre, less attacking threat from their right hand side.

Catalans right hand centre is a NZ international who got a hat trick last Sunday. I wouldn't have Hall anywhere near the side until he stops being a fairy.

Exactly how i would describe him !!

cracker , quote of the week

Tansey isn't much further behind him when it comes to defence though.

That's a very strange opinion.

What's the matter - isn't it positive enough for YOUR board?

Disagree with that, Tansey is a good one on one defender, Hall isn't.

You have been watching a different Tansey to me. Granted he started well but he is missing or falling off a lot of tackles over the last 4 or 5 games for me.

Well that's over 50 less games than what Hall has been falling off tackles in.

I am not denying Hall is awful in defence. Just for a full back Tanseys defence at times is very poor.

The thing is that it isnt just Hall defence, he drops to many balls and make the wrong decison too many times with ball in hand. He is also lazy and doesnt help the team out like Yeaman and Briscoe do.

Apart from a good try every 5 games I'm not sure what he adds to the team at the moment.

Good assessment.

Except that it's a try every two games on average so far this season.

One of Hull's worst performers this year mate. You have to be able to play to the required standard with and without the ball. Typifies the half-d attitude that loses games. Tansey is another in that mould.