So where's this axe agar was wielding??

like i said on the other thread

Hall
Calderwood
Whiting
Yeaman
Briscoe
R. Horne
Thorman
Dowes
Berrigan
King
Radford
Tickle
Washbrook

Manu
Thackray
Cusack
Lee (would rather of had Houghton for some impact)

Drop Washbrook and Moa for me.

Lee offers more than Washbrook from the bench.
Washbrook needs more game time to get back into the game, he'd be a risk to play in this one I think.

i went to watch training and by the way the wer setting up the teams it will be the same 13 with king,thackray,lee and washbrook as subs

that will be the team then, my dad was working there earlier in season and the team they practiced with was the same on match day, including subs

I know, cocksack, tackle, kong and wishbone was getting right on my t1ts last week too

is it just me who finds it very strange houghton isnt in the squad again?

very but i think agar must of had a knock to the head to pick lee over him

Houghton can only ever replace Berrigan. Ideally we want him on the pitch if fit and/or interested so Lee offers more from the bench in that he can spell the back row or cover halfback. Houghton's passing hasn't improved either and Lee to be fair has done little wrong this season when he's played. Earned a place really with his performance last week when compared to most of the rest.

Yep I agree. Thought we would have seen Agar 'wield his axe' and chop 3 players from the 'Pathetic' 16 (Manu exempt) last Sun and replace them with Houghton, Thackray and Whiting. If he starts with the same 17, it really does send out a message alright...'Play as e as you like lads, doesn't matter cos you will play next week'

I didn't read in the press that someone had found an injection that made people grow testicles, until the do Agar will do as he is told.

If all the team adopted Lee's enthusiasm, we would still be in the cup. He's been keen and effective the last 2 games and can fill in in a number of positions. Shame for Houghton but Lee offers more from the bench at the moment.

Bloddy hell, I agree.

Lee was makig a difference, shame bubbles didn't bring im on early.

So as a Neutral (If Possible) Who looks the better side on paper and form?...

Rovers, simplez.

hull on paper rovers on form

We're impatient to get Lee on the pitch. How did it come to this?

Pretty even on paper although Rovers have a more balanced 17 with specialist players in specialist positions. On form, Rovers by some distance.

rovers on paper rovers on form

Whiting in the centres to pick off the ar$eholes long pass.....

shame hed get chased down in our half

dont agree.. hull have a better team but do not know how to play

at the moment, who do you reckon they would want from our team ?
i would say - rich horne, berrigan and manu