Watched it with a few mates im staying with and it was there 1st game of rugby theyve seen. You can guess what they thought of it.

Kicking on the 3rd tackle, just one man drives for a whole set. I even found myself watching most of England on the other screen.

Agree with most of these points.. I think we did the exact opposite if what we did in the Cas game and we did them both the wrong way round. Kicked for 2 when we should have run it in as hey were defending the 3rd set on the line in a row and they looked a bit knackered.

We held on to the ball against a team when we could have thrown it about more. At one poin in the second have we off-loaded it nearly every tackle and things started looking up!!!... and then that was it no more off-loads.

But agree we are the most stupid team in the league. On paper we nearly have similar quality personel to Leeds, Saints but they are much smarter players and I dont know why!

Bet they thought they would rather watch paint dry on the walls i know i did

It was a gutless performance from players and coaching staff alike

Washy HAS to be at 13 to give us more attacking options, Radders at 13 doesn't work who much longer are they going to carry on with that 1

And Agar said he wanted us to play a more expansive game towards the back of last season. He can't hide behind the fact we have no Halfbacks this time.

Just bad coaching in the last few weeks, must be so easy to defend against

spot on

Especially when Radford plays as an extra prop.

Even though we were poor, as stated in lots of posts so far, can't see mention of some poor decisions, the knock on against Yeaman/Briscoe that led to a scrum to Quins and their first try, there was'nt one, the penalty under the sticks that gave them the lead, Silverwood sets off running with Tickle, then brings play back, and two PTB that were illegal,in a tight boring game we needed those to go our way

......Craig Hall being offside for his try

Apart from that.

Fair enough, why was it allowed then?

For the same reason most of the decisions you mentioned were.

Because he was level.

If thats the case it should have been disallowed.

The rules state the player must be 'behind' the kicker, not level

OK, the others don't allow for TV replays to solve them,

Level is onside

Pedantic I know but their is no such thing as onside. Your either offside or your not.

Pedantic, but it's there and you're

Shut it you







I have to type quickly before anyone sees my screen at work

Both feet must be [ibehind[/i the kicker, a point made by Phil Clarke at the time.