Who??

Probably the same game that I remember too.

I'd rather bring Broughton back than sign Reardon. Someone with a decent injury record would do!

I think Reardon's a good full back, but we should be going nowhere near anyone with a suspect injury record.

Will he get a visa tho' ,wasn't he involved in an incident with Pryce recently.

No but Mastercard will snap him up!!

its all about value for me. If we get him on a cheapish wage then for me he probably would cost less than byrne and for me he is as good as if not better. Would have to have some sort of clause in his contract though which reflects on games played. If he dont play many he dont get paid much. The lad has to prove he is fit and still retains ability until then he can not demand top dollar.

If he can't get in a team at the botttom of the league with a fullback making mistake after mistake you have to question the idea

dont think he is match fit yet m8. If he was then without doubt he would start at full back for that shambles of overpaid dick turpins. At least he wore a mask when he stole money. Lol

I would hope to think that we stay well clear from this one. I hope that the club will think abit more before signing injury prone players.

not my cup of tea either but he played as many games as rich horne last year and still a decent age. If fit would be a decent signing coverin various positions. An english todd byrne.

Horne had a horror season and very rarely gets injured. Reardon does and misses quite a few games every season.

aint him and leon price still got to go to court for somethink what happened at reardon ex's house

reardons a good player and if was fully fit and didn't have to help he police with enquires i'd welcome him as back up.

but hes never fit and does have to help police.

[url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25111802-2722,00.htmlWITT[/url ???

Think that was last season when they where looking to replace Dykes.

Wouldnt go anywhere near him.

you haven't read the link have you?



after reading that i expect him to sign for hull in the coming weeks. thorman to full back!

www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/ar ... d=10558866 Says he has been named as full back if so and considering our limited options now for full back and the fact he will be free to sign could there be something in this

www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/ar ... d=10558866 Says he has been named as full back if so and considering our limited options now for full back and the fact he will be free to sign could there be something in this

I'd expect Hull to have a look at Witt, possibly offer him a contract to the end of the season. It will give him an opportunity to impress and rebuild his career and us to assess whether he's worth keeping on a longer contract.

hes not a full back mate hes a half back who can, at a push, play full back.

i've no doubt he'll sign for hull.

Do we even need this Witt?

According to one of the articles, he's a stand off. That would either mean that Thorman is dropped/moved, and Horne moves to 7 - or Horne is dropped/moved and Thorman stays at 7.

Tony should be back in a month or so. I'm quite happy to keep Hall at fullback until he's back, and rather we did this than go out an make an unnecessary overseas signing.

if thorman or horne gets injured who would you play there?

Witt would be a massive improvement on Thorman.

On what grounds?

We end up with two no.6's and no SH though.