All of those runs are from the same game. Hardly a best of package.

From that game. Did we see all of his runs? Game-time? Defence, barring the one goal-line shot?

Ffs

No offence to Feka but if huddersfield can sign kaufusi from London and he was obviously available why couldn't we at least try for him?
Bigger, younger, aggressive, would have been an ideal replacement and great impact prop and an improvement over feka.

FFS, stop moaning. Kaufusi isn't a patch on Feka, if he was would he have been at London?

FWIW I am not particularly disagreeing, but London > than Limaux or wherever Feka was playing. Your logic is wrong.

How do we know we didn't try and sign Kafausi? It would hardly be a shock if he chose Hudds over us, would it?

He also missed 37 tackles and conceded 12 penalties.

FFS, it's Feka, I wouldn't be surprised if that two minute clip [iwas[/i everything he did!

FFS I was hardly moaning so grow up.
Kaufusi one of the better players at London, Feka binned off from Salford playing part time in France so go figure.
It was only my opinion of course but I see kaufusi as the better player, maybe that's why hudds took him and not Feka eh.
But as one poster alluded too why would the better player choose us over Huddersfield.

Give me kaufusi over Feka any day of the week.

TBH everyone's entitled there opinions but comparing players to Feka at this moment in time is pointless. For all we no Feka could come to us in great shape and be our new Sam Moa (Despite Age). He could come an be garbage.

But until we see him for ourselves it's pointless slagging him off or saying we should of signed him instead. Could be our best bit of business/ could be worst.

I'd rather have him than Lynch. Lynch couldn't run the ball in like that and skittle players.

Radders knows what makes a forward pack and he's building that himself.

I'm more worried about his lack of movement in defence. He'll more than likely be a liability.

Realistically, how many 1 on 1 tackles do props make? You've also got to look at what's around him. We have a very well drilled solid defence, I'm more than happy that we can sacrifice a little of that to make more impact in attack with him. Also 90% of the time he'll have Houghton inside him and Ellis outside, then Whiting/Westy/Pitts outside that. We'll be alright.

Wattsy is often not moving up with the rest of the line. And that's a slim fit prop, now I'd expect better. So I dread to think what Feka is capable of when he has lapses in defence.
Hope I'm just knit picking, I just hope he's in really good shape and not knackered after 8 minutes like he was at Wigan.

I remember been at wigan vs FC a few seasons ago when feka had a cracking game our pack couldnt handle him he made several breaks even ran over his future coach anyone remember which season?

2007?

Was ages ago, but type Biggest 10 ever Feka Paleaaesina into that video website. Ripped us to pieces.

thanks. Off the feka track... when did galea sign for widnes? or have i missed something?

Danny Galea has signed bfor Widnes.

Ah right, i just read tickle and galea on one of there posts and thought benny ad done a u-turn.

Spot on. Like we'd sign Feka to defend



The guys who don't have the impact will have to trade that for a bit more work to cover the impact prop.

It's somewhere on youtube.

Some people love a moan don't they?
Nobody ever signs an out n out impact player for their defence. If we wanted defence Johnston would still be about.
Also saying that's probably all he did all game! Fook me, could take all the footage of all our forwards put together from this season n come up with less highlightable footage than than.
I think his role will be simple, short n sharp in small bursts n exactly what we've been crying out for. Personally think he could be a masterstroke. Got him cheap as chips as well!!

Your missing the point.
Of course we haven't signed him for his defence. But when he's knackered running the back the line and hasn't got time to turn around and move back up with the rest of the lads. He'll be getting targeted for leaving gaps in the defence.