If Peter Sharp is the answer then someone is asking the wrong question.

Well if anyone is qualified to speak on that subject, Dobbins fans are.

Peter Sharp, Richard Agar, Peter Gentle...what do all 3 have in common? all assistant coaches who've never proven themselves as head coaches. Time to bring someone in who's actually been there and won things.

Peter Sharp was a good coach,talk about injury crisis's,he had to deal with twice as many problems as Agar or Gentle,but you could guarantee whatever side he put out they would gave 110%.

Fook off dick. You won your cup final today so go away and enjoy it in Crown or summat with the rest of your cronies.
Fact is, yes we are crap at the moment, but we will turn it around when the other half of our team is available.
Fact is we have always been and always will be the far superior and best supported rugby league club in the city and come the end of the season we will have bigger fish to fry.
Trot on.

Trotting like a prancing pony thanks.

we should have never got rid in the first place. A bit of poor recruitment cost him his job. considering what we have had to put up with since I wish we had him back.

Exactly dumb fooker. Youve got to be the thickest on here surely

Noble or Brian Smith

and what we've learnt about the board since then makes you wonder if most of the signings were his or Rule/Hetherington's decisions anyway. But still its not 2008 anymore, lets not look backwords, lets think about getting a proper coach in and moving forwards.

Im a genius compared to you,you fooking to$$er.

Dont be silly. Sharp was ueless too but still better than this idiot Gentle

Errr..Noble started as a no2 as well you know and Smith has a habit of buggering off...IF Gentle goes,id give him a bit longer to see what he can do when injurys clear up,id go for Anderson.

Smith hasn't won anything either , but I'd have him back here in a shout . We can afford him now.

Noble started as a no2, but went on to win loads of trophies, and instantly improved Crusaders with little money to spend in his last job. Smith famously has won nothing but has got teams to several finals (and i'd take being the bridesmaid at a major final instead of the dross we are having now!) I agree Anderson would be the best choice though, his Saints side played some fantastic rugby.

Anderson,he had. IMO the best Super League side I've seen at his disposal,it was hard to fook that up.

If Anderson ever decided to come to Hull , We'd need to completely rebuild the team .

Id take Sharp back in a heart beat. He was a good coach go back and look at the rugby we played under him. He had massive injury problems to deal with.

That was roughly when it all started.

Balls........

On paper, BEFORE the start if the season I said our signings were poor and those we did sign were over hyped and over rated!!

Agree, very average and no-one to fill Moa or Manu's spaces. The players brought in besides Ellis and DJ are average joe's who do not improve the side in any way. We even have one of them (Crookes) sitting on the sidelines he's that good!

I don't see how he's been a bad signing at all. He was playing well before injury. Since then Lineham's come in & done just as good, possibly better so no reason to take him out of the team. Should Lineham or Briscoe get injured he'll come back in the team & probably play well, if we hadn't signed him we'd probably just end up playing Whiting there again.

Yes because we're picking Lineham who looks very promising when going forward, but sadly lacking (along with Arundel) in defence. Rovers left side must have thought it was Christmas with the space they were given. I actually felt sorry for Lineham because he had to keep going infield to touch the ball, because it certainly wasn't coming along the line to him. Crookes must be worth a run because he was doing nothing wrong till his injury.