Wonder why Radders said that though?

His English seems fine!

Taking the Michael i'd assume

we need direction both in the side and from the coach.

1. tansey 7. long 9. berrigan 13. washbrook fills me with optimism!

Up until this season I'd have agreed that he was held. However, it's been made clear on any number of occasions that the refs are now allowing players to break out of tackles on the floor if they don't stop moving and they haven't called held.

It's not an interpretation I agree with TBH but you can only play to the rules as applied.

Nahhhh

he does me as he was totally anonymous as was R Horne!

from 7 and 9 yes. hence why i put at 13

He's not a Stand Off, he's a Loose Forward. You'll notice that's where Sheldon put him in that line up.

Good for you 'Sweet Cheeks!' You're obviously living proof that money can't buy you credibility, or prevent you from being a 'Complete TOOL!'

The missing link there being Stand Off. Horne is going to have to stage a comeback worthy of Lazarus on the off season if he's going to be any use there. Or indeed anywhere else.

weve had virtually no aggression all season.weve just won the fair play award,but as they say nice guys come last.a bit of minor biff might of fired us up a bit.if were gonna lose a game i'd rather go down fighting then lose with a whimper

More embarrassing is being soft and on the back foot all the time. I've seen enough of that for 2-3 seasons so the new stuff is just fine.

but the indisipline cost us.

controlled aggression is good dont get me wrong but hame let his emotions get away with him.

No half backs cost us. The aggression will win us more games next season. Bring it on.

controlled agression will not giving away needless penalties

Not Hames though, he didn't conceed a penalty at all did he?

who conceded the last one? honest question.

Hame's aggression led directly to Morrison being binned. With better halves we would have taken advantage of that.

To be fair, Hame didn't actually give away any penalties. I was more concerned that he'd end up binned for retaliation.

it certainly did, although replays suggest we were lucky to get the first decision.

Although not Hame's, it cost us two points as a result of a penalty, not two points as in the game.

We've been lacking controlled aggression for too long. Perhaps all Hame needs is to control his aggression. Remember that he's missed a lot of game time in the last year.

Plus it was worth it to see the gobby pseudo-hardcase Morrision going backwards at a rate of knots.

what about the penalty from the scrum? was that against the full pack? what was goodwin accusing hame of?

Yup. That's why I only said he needs to calm down a little bit. Good to see the passion, just needs to be a little careful.


Oh yes.

thats all i'm saying

It was probably easier for the referee to award a penalty to Hull in the circumstances at that end of the field rather than give Bradford the opportunity to take the lead again for a nothing incident.