New Horney's Blog: www.richardhorne.co.uk/blog11.htm

New Horney's Blog: www.richardhorne.co.uk/blog11.htm

New Horney's Blog: www.richardhorne.co.uk/blog12.htm Panto Info: www.richardhorne.co.uk/news37.htm Events Diary Updated: www.richardhorne.co.uk/events.htm

New Horney's Blog: www.richardhorne.co.uk/blog12.htm Panto Info: www.richardhorne.co.uk/news37.htm Events Diary Updated: www.richardhorne.co.uk/events.htm

www.richardhorne.co.uk/gallery/g ... ladies.htm A few familiar faces in there!

www.richardhorne.co.uk/gallery/g ... ladies.htm A few familiar faces in there!

17th of January it is then

Do you think many Rovers fans will be boycotting it as "revenge" for the £1 Children in Need donation at last year's derby? I've heard this may be the case.

Yes I do

thats just sad what has rich got to do with any of that?

Plenty of Hull fans will attend i'm sure

It's "revenge" against the £1 donation to a childrens charity. The fact that it's Richard Horne that loses out and doesn't impact FC either way is lost on them.

I'd guess the fact you hoodwinked us into a do nation and the fact you couldn't be bothered to turn out to the derby at CP made some people minds up for them.

Hull KR fans owe Richard Horne nothing at the end of the day so if they don't want to turn out then so be it

correct.

I personaly think a good crowd will turn out for him,fans will be chomping at the bit by then to get back to watching a bit of rugby

Pathetic.

i think sadkunts is the word you was looking for

Remind me who initiated charging extra for derbies? And an extra £7 straight into their bank account, rather than a single £1 to charity? If people don't feel inclined to support Richard Horne, fine, but it shouldn't be turned into "revenge" against FC. Your unofficial chums are calling for this to be a headline in the local media: "Rovers revenge for FC fans boycott". FC won't be impacted one way or another.

"Big Issue! Big Issue Please!"

definetly the word i would use

Its the fact that FC imposed a compulsory contribution to a charity on ROVERS fans and then gloated over THEIR magnificent donation to the media that rankles .... Rovers fans had no choice but to pay ... there was no way that we could have opted out other than by not going. So, because of FC's deplorable actions one of THEIR players is going to suffer financially. Hard luck mates ... they should have thought of that!

I actually complained to CinN afterwards. Lets just say, according to their response, it's unlikely that the situation will be repeated!

A somewhat selective memory.

Hudgell started all this with his £7 supplement, not just once but 4 times. And not to charity either.
FC will not be impacted either way by you choosing not to go, the only one to lose out will be Richard. What you are "proving" by boycotting the 10 year testimonial of one of the city's sporting role models is unclear. Surely a more appropriate boycott would be the KC derby?

Oh don't be so bloody precious you big girl's blouse.

Before spitting your dummy further than James Graham, you may want to get your facts straight. The ticket prices for that game were increased by £1 throughout the stadium, it wasn't just for Rovers fans. Well done for ignoring the fact that your club increases the price of a ticket by 70% when we play at Craven Park too, but only for away fans, not throughout the stadium.

And you actually complained to Children in Need about a company rasing money for them? Get a life, you plank.

Halloween come early?

So ..... Hull FC passholders also paid the surcharge did they????

Oh stop whining you drama queen. If you don't want to go, don't go. Stop making up rubbish excuses.

Any Rovers "fan" who doesn't go to this game because of the £1 donation is a plank plain and simple. I'm expecting quite a few to stay at home.

Testimonial Derby Game: www.richardhorne.co.uk/news38.htm

Testimonial Derby Game: www.richardhorne.co.uk/news38.htm