If you look at who we could be losing, it's easier to see what we need:-

Hall - Promotion of Lyne
Calderwood - Sharp
Dowes -
Yak - A young prop

So if anything we are short of one prop, but that would be a fith prop and with Lauaki/Fitz having the ability to play that role I can't see the need to sign two.

If Berro plays in the centres then we need cover for Houghton but that would probably be Washy, I reckon even Horne could play that role if required.

The key for me is another halfback, can't see us getting Chase, more likely to be a youngster from here or NRL.

It does seem odd I agree. Perhaps he is hoping to stay beyond his 4th year and thought being exempt and off quota would increase his value?

What big name?

After one season in the Nrl Manlys half back Brett Hodkinson has agreed a $800,000(£480,000) three year dealmwith Canterbury.

There in short supply oin oz why would they come here?

I have no doubts he wants to be here longer, he's bought a house (again, from what I am told), if he is played at Centre next season than I would be quite happy to keep him another two years after that, but he wouldn't be a "big" signing.

I think your half right he did all the work because he wants to stay longer than next season, I believe the club solicitors handled it though and the club paid!

Do you believe we have King and Raynors cap still available?

I think washy to 9 could be as effective as murrells move there.

That would seem fair enough then.

You have to laugh though I see the Mail got the news posted at 8-45am, obviously been reading the message boards, or listening to the radio, EXPRO please note!

i would have thought next season berro will still be sharing the hooking role with houghton. i don't see the point in playing him at centre when we will have to sign a new hooker; and IMO there is nobody else in the squad who can rotate with houghton apart from tansey, but i can't see that happening

i agree berro looked good at centre but there's no reason he can't excel at hooker next season rotating with houghton

as for losing two props in cusack & dowes, i would move fitz or lauaki to prop and give washbrook 13 shirt every week (because i rate washbrook). then we can concentrate on signing a player in the mould of Chase - just what we need

I would move Washy to 9 because he is nowhere near good enough to play 6 but may get opportunity at 13 with Fitz to prop.

He is a Clive Churchill medal winger at centre, he has done well in his natural position, keep him there.

I think he also wants to stay in the area after his playing days, so i'm told.

No, perhaps aportion of it but it will have been used on other players upgrades.

Berrigans best position is Centre and he has done really well in the last few games there. If you have a back on the bench then you can always rotate if you want to give houghton a rest.

Washbrook is garbage I just dont see the big deal over him.

Yeah, keep him at centre. Washy could play 9 as cover just like Moore/Murrell.

There's a few options in our squad, alot depends on where Agar sees Tansey and Berrigan and to a lesser extent Fitzgibbon, Lauaki and Briscoe.

Tansey will be fullback for me. Unless we sign one which I can't see happening. Whiting could play fullback allowing Tansey to cover 6,7 & 9 but imo Tansey is a better option at fullback.

Quote ="Standee"He is a Clive Churchill medal winger at centre, he has done well in his natural position, keep him there.'" No he's not. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Bri ... ected=true

Quote ="Standee"He is a Clive Churchill medal winger at centre, he has done well in his natural position, keep him there.'" No he's not. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Bri ... ected=true

If we sign him, I'm bidding for the contract to supply the letters E and A to the club for shirts.

If he is Berro needs to be the other centre.

If we can't get a halfback i'd be looking for a ball playing fullback and use Tansey to cover the halfs and hooker.

Isn't that what Tansey is?

Wouldn't happen , yeaman will never get dropped.

If we was going to use Tansey in the halves we should of signed Mathers.

Quote ="Sheldon"No he's not. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Bri ... ected=true'" Apologies But he has shown more for FC at Centre than hooker in my opinion, and Centre is his natural position.

Quote ="Sheldon"No he's not. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Bri ... ected=true'" Apologies But he has shown more for FC at Centre than hooker in my opinion, and Centre is his natural position.