Can't see anymore props coming in unless a couple of props have already got other clubs interested in them ie King and Thackray.

King AND Thackray won't be here next season

And you know this how? King is already signed on therefore a fee would be involved unless he agrees? That's how it works isn't it?

King has a contract for next year thanks to Agar but it hasn't taken too long for him to regret giving him it. He wants rid and it is pretty common knowledge amongst many people.

If, by any chance, anyone else is prepared to take him, we will be rid of him.

If this is true, then it is further evidence of Agar's lack of ability as a head coach imo.

On Australian currently on one leg, unable to walk without the aid of cruches, damn right we're interested!

If he's unwanted then we should pay him off out of this year's surplus. We should have the cash and the cap space due to crocker's non arrival

So it's not certain he won't be here then which would mean we don't need another prop, unless we pay him off.

Agar had nothing to do with signing King up for another two seasons.

[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/bradford/8141687.stmNewton no longer a Bull after this season[/url

Hmmm, be a good signing for us, Berrigan to centre?

I wouldn't want him TBH. Well past his best and we have more than adequate cover in his position IMO.

Expensive and pointless IMO.

Yeah, great idea. Him and long get on like a house on fire

Would not go anywhere near him, has been rubbish for the last two seasons.

No.

Yes lets sign newton, we are a bit short on hookers.

Moore would be a very poor signing, he has had half a good season just like Korki. His has very poor defence for a prop, misses too many tackles.

Would rather keep Thacks or King.

Newton has signed for Wakefield anyway.

Correct and Drew is rumoured to be a Tiger next year!

how many more hookers do we need?are we opening a brothel?

Was just a question, had heard mutterings he might be FC bound, I echo the sentiments though, not a player we need.

I would like to see Berrigan at centre/6 though.

No, he wouldn't do it as well as Cusack. I've said as much on other threads. However I don't think the difference would be a problem with a better pack overall. The only real advantage Cusack offers is a quicker ptb, and that should surely be improvable (if not it's a worry. It's not a problem with Radford specifically either, it's a problem with our squad in general. All of our players who do offer it have brought it with them rather than learnt it here, it's an area that needs addressing at the coaching stage IMO).

Also, I don't think Cusack should be playing as long as he does, so that's no issue in the slightest IMO.

taking into acount o'meley,fitzgibbon,cusack and berrigan, that nearly makes up for a third of an nrl winning pack......and boasts 47 kangaroo caps and 11 grand finals between them..not bad going that!!!

o'meley berrigan cusack
luaki fitzgibbon
???????????


who would everyones first choice 13 be? washbrook,whiting,radford??

I would rather see Houghton starting teams cant cope with his pace around the ruck and Berrigan at stand off.

Better coming off the bench IMO.

He has gone to cas