which idiot decided blake Austin should be allowed to play for England.?what a joke and an insult to genuine uk players.sooner we have rid of bennett the better.

great player but i agree having an English Grandmother is a bit rich
Its as bad as Cricket

I was about to say they're taking a leaf out of the England cricket teams book, but you beat me to it

Not saying I agree or disagree, but it's hardly a new thing that Bennett has brought in.

Both Rangi Chase and Chris Heighington have both played for England in the last few years

hmmm, so where was he the last few years playing in the NRL? didnt see him offer his allegiance to england then, suddenly now he plays in the superleague and any chance of playing for aus has completely gone he wants in! maybe if he chose england whilst playing in the nrl it wouldnt be so bad!

no thanks!

Don’t see no problem with it myself , Aussies have even done it themselves so if we turn it down it makes it more difficult to catch them . Don’t think they’ll be many complaints if he and a couple more help us start beating them regularly.

He seems to go missing when things get tough so seems the perfect fit for an England half back. Also have jake trueman in there so you know the bottom of the barrel is well scraped.

Oh for a new gregory/edwards combo there

I've heard this "goes missing" criticism levelled at him before. It's not as simple as that. You can see he is a class player, but in this present team there are so many around him that just aren't performing, we are all aware of who they are.
Expectation from our end for the match tomorrow is very low, which might be a good thing for us.

Didn't go missing today

no he had a good game, as did your team,

Can we do it a bit more often though?

Was excellent today.

austin looked great because we let him play and didn't put any pressure on him all game whereas sneyd was hammered every time he put a kick in

Absolutely right Jake that was the whole difference we gave him all the time in the world which gave him the confidence to dictate. No complaints the best team won but with 3 minutes to go I thought we were goint to nick it.

wire were definitely the best team and it's amazing we were only 2 points behind with 3 minutes to play

I’m starting to think, that our defensive tactic is to let the opposition come to us, rather then moving up and nailing them. That’s what it’s looked like this season anyway. Get away with it against some teams, but not the better opposition

On topic - Widdop

I've thought the same for a while now and maybe it's about energy conservation and hoping we stay fresher for longer in games

Every time we get up there and at them, we concede a pen for a high shot or offside.

Now can I say that your comment is spot on for me, I've been saying for weeks, we seem happy to let most teams put 60 odd yards on us in any given set of six so they are ending their sets every time with a dangerous up and under rather than forcing them to make a much safer kick for distance because we have restricted their yards. Good point!

Let’s hope the team sat down together and watched the Melbourne v Manly game, perfect example how to defend with intensity, absolutely brutal, loved it

I appreciate you're only hypothesising but I don't think any coach worth their salt could possibly think you will conserve energy by hanging back in defence.

Giving up ground like that you'll simply spend a disproportionate amount of time defending your own line and consume more energy defending the repeat sets the opposition will inevitably force.

What's your theory then?

I don't think it's a deliberate strategy. I just don't think they've been coached to be aggressive in defence.

I'm not buying that, a rugby team not coached to be aggressive in defence.

It's a deliberate tactical ploy we've employed through the last few seasons, hold the defensive line and let them come to us.

I've also been frustrated with this method.