of peter sharp coming out tonite with mr agar...poor bench..lack lustre defence.BUT i dont think tonites performance had anything to do with mr agar it was how much the players wanted it,after watching it for 50/60 mins we seemed ok but then we just seemed to GRIND IT OUT...and thats all we did..we need to have some urgency especially in the P.T.B.  and meeting them on there attack(which was poor tonite)instead ov giving them 20 or so yards start and the lack ov ideas on there try line,on the positive side the tackling was excellent as there werent many missed and were good strong tackles and looked as fit as f**k.


anyone think we need raynor back....and quick..

Thought this thread was about justine morgan for a moment there



On the serious side, the sooner raynor is back the better.

Fully agree about Raynor, seriously missing him.

Yeah because you really need to make some yards sideways

raynors better than anyone you have FACT

We've already got calderwood who does that

Ok then fool get over yourself you got beat again against a very average Quins team and look a very ordinary team

And replace who ? Would then Raynor receive more ball than who he replaces ?

Age old problem at Hull.

Im not convinced Gareth Raynor would've made much difference tonight to be honest.

I don't think he'd have made a difference tonight. We tried to play up the middle and our forwards were beaten. When we did get the ball in any sort of position, we had no idea what to do with it. Raynor, as good as he is, wouldn't have changed that.

nor me

whatever, we got beat by a hardworking quins team, you got beat by the then BOTTOM team. no need for the abuse either.

Take the pi $$ all you want,Raynor would be welcome in most teams.

However the same Quins team stuck 60 points on the team that beat your lot

puts things into perspective that statement doesnt it.

ok fair comment that raynor wouldnt have done much IF he had played with tonites tactics ...but would he have added another dimension if we`d have had him in the team...the quins sought out what we should have done in the game...and i had seen it within the first 10 mins of the game to be honest the fact we needed to play more expansive game...easy to say now i hear you all say...but that were my thoughts..we were playing too much middle rugby hmmmm all well and good if you have the team to batter em but we lack a certain amount ov power in the forwards,im not saying were crap just lacking a little,we have better backs than alot ov teams...so lets use em.......against a leeds or saints team in the last 7 games we would have struggled but not every team is leeds or saints so we need to see there weeknesess and move in on them with great heed and push em to there limits with which we arent doing,just grinding out a win is not good enough to beat a poor leeds or saints team or even a team like wakefield for instance,i believe the work rate should be upped immensely as we nearer the middle of the season an pushed to the peak at the end ov the season......we have the players to do this this season............DO THEY BELIEVE?????????

Get told

What a load of Bolloxs.......what would he do with out a pass from our centres.

didnt know rovers had wingers...just sum travellers that roamed up and down the touchline pickpocketing

He's class and consistently selected for the national team. It's bolloxs to suggest his absence doesn't make the team weaker.

raynor adds a bit ov depth to the team he can cover a few angles which by the look ov things seem to go missed by the adoring fa....sorry dedicated supporters.

How the hell can he make us better when out centres dont pass.......Briscoe has coverd him well and Calderwood hasnt done nothing different than what he would have done.

Doesnt sodding play though as he is on the treatment table.

You need to get your Raynor specs off and look at the bigger picture.

A bit rich coming from Craig Hall's stalker

Eh?

Wtf you on about?

I have slated Hall in the past........you need to stop watching Raynors ar$e and legs and watch a match for a change.

Could we try and keep it civil please guys.

Cheers.