Did he return after his first spell? Went off after 20 mins and I don't remember him coming back.
Is he injured?

Dunno, hard to tell these days

He didn't come back on but i noticed he was just sat on the bench for the rest of the game. Could've been a tactical decision

Harsh but fair.

To be fair to Yak he played 20 mins in his spell which equates to his normal 2x10 min spells.

no impact whatsoever.......a year to far in my and many others book....

Our worst forward by a long way.

Being a great servant to the club...clearly ready to hang his boots at the end of the year...

It's a shame to see, but he's clearly lost all of his main attributes that made him a valued team member .I.e. Rarely getting dominated in the tackle, quick play the ball and his mistake free workrate.

spot on lyn,some people will never be happy.

some people are happy with mediocraty...i am not......

well said, worked hard for FC

Happy that we're paying him for a year he's not good enough for? Don't quite see why we should be TBH.

As for him not coming back on, I took it as a hopeful sign that Agar has also now realised we're weaker with him on the pitch and he won't feature again this season except in an emergency. Personally I think we may have been better off giving Nicklas a run on Friday and playing Washbrook at loose man instead.

not doubting his commitment to the cause...but quite simply and obviuosly NOT GOOD ENOUGH nomore

so you think he was worthy of another year?? the guy has done nothing this season, below average would be put on his report card, you really cant argue with that Wolfie, he may have been a good servant, but even good servants become tired, and not as good as they once was, no sentiments in sport fela, you should know that!

yeh i did think he was worthy of another year,but now its time for him to go,as he does,thats why hes retiring.

it was a year too long, IMO, nice guy, but average player

Let's see how he finishes the season - remember he's not long back from an injury himself.

And he was ripping up trees before it?

I'd love to see it, but I won't hold my breath for a sudden revival.

No, but we know that he will carry us through tough times if and when needed. He is a prop nearing the end of his career who needs game time and fitness to gather momentum. I don't expect him to disappoint at the business end of the season.

Me neither.....he will do a job for us no doubts there.

Just to stick up for Yak a bit is it a coincedence that last 2 games when he has started we have kept the opposition to 0 points by the time Cusask first shift has ended? His first 15-20 mins against both Hudds and Catalans I am sure led to both teams been kept blank.

I also noticed David Ferriol leave the pitch on Friday after 9 minutes (i did check with the official clock

) looking cream crackered! Maybe Cusack and Dowes do have a positive impact not noticed by a chunk of the watching speccies?

dont think his solid defence alone has anything to do with with us keeping both teams scoreless but no doubt it helps...as for ferriol, lets look realistically....he is a forward used in the first 15 mins to do as much as possible with the ball in hand...hence his limited game-time..cusack on the other hand as stated before, makes no impact with ball in hand...harsh but fair assumption in my book

Could see the point in paying off yak if we were able to get a half back from oz but with visa's were not going to get one . Also with us struggling for forwards he will still be needed

Dont get me wrong I am not saying it is because of Cusack just merely highlighting that he does add value to our middle defence when starting.

I was also factually wrong having watched Boots n All Cusack was still on the pitch when Casey McGuire scored...