Cant really say I know much about this lad. What can we expect from him ?

Not seen much, but apparentley a real talent

On the back of Agar's comments last week i'd expect him to be moved about the side for a while....which indicates he fits the catagory of utility player!

another

i get the impression his best position is 13 or 6. IMO he shouldnt need to play centre since our other players are surely superior. i would like to see turner to play 6 for a while or compete for 13 with washy. not fussed about rich horne until we see him back to his best...

if agar has any sense he would only consider washy, turner and then fitzy for 13. however in the tuner article he mentions radford which is very worrying indeed - you've got 3 x loose forwards (good ones too) at your disposal and you still consider radders!

That's cos Agar is a fool!

Turner is ok, he'll do a job for you, he wants to play 6 so i guess he'll play there as that is one of the reasons he left us, he is better at 13 imo, misses a few tackles in the centres and isnt the finished artlce, he is still developing and another season with us would have made him a better player.

But money talks and off he went.....

Thanks for the info

No problem

I wouldnt get too giddy about him he wont take you to the next level on his own, not at the moment anyway. Id hope for your sake he's used more as a squad player who fills in if injuries rather than a main line strike player.

I hope i'm wrong but Agar has 13 down as a defensive position...hence Radders there. Considering who should be available next year i hope he will change his view..however i won't hold my breath.

With a much larger pack next year i will be disappointed if we don't utilise any of Washy/Whiting/Turner in that order.

13 is a creative position and a grafter should not be playing LF IMO

Totally agree - the more ball playing forwards we have in the side the more confusion is created in oppositions defence...something we have sadly lacked.

I believe Washy will play 13.

The big call Agar has to make is from a cover perspective, does he use Turner or Whiting?

Centres Yeaman Hall Briscoe Turner. Stand off Horne Whiting Washbrook Turner. Loose Washbrook Whiting Fitzgibbon Turner. I dont expect to see much of him tbh.

I think he will act as cover for Horne and Washy and possibly the centres too if we get a few injuries. I don't see him being in our strongest 17.

I think he has left for more than just money, in fact I would be suprised if Salford didnt offer him the same as Hull, as I couldn't see Hull offering him a lot, with the other players signed. I think he has moved to a club where he has more chance of winning something in the future and a new challenge.

I can Turner being squad player, who will get a few games at Hull when we have injuries.l

How many ball playing loose forwards are there around nowdays?

If he is a replacement for G Horne, then Hull have done some good business.

He doesnt it the HDM that mentions Radford.

Radford should be a back at prop/backrow at best.

Not sure but it's what i would like to see.

right you are, what a relief

i imagine whiting and turner will both be ready in the event of an injury to washy or rich horne. and tuffour for the outside backs.
seems like we have some much better competition for places than what we've had in past couple of years which will be good

Rumour has it he's getting a very good wage now, dont get me wrong he is no duffer just is at a crutial time in his development and i feel he's gone 2 years too early like Myler.

He'll play/cover standoff as thats where he thinks he is best............

I spotted a video on youtube of him playing, I reckon hes ganna be a good signing for us, the lads got pace and can break through defense well.

Type in youtube "hull fc vs salford 2009" I think its the second video down called "Hull FC v Salford City Reds - Carnegie Challenge Cup Rnd 4 - April 5 2009"

I see him being another craig hall kinder player

I hope he didn't throw "that" pass!