They may as well put that above the players entrance to BV such are the numbers of players who have come to the club supposedly drinking from there.

You would have to imagine this deal is quite favourable to us also. Hull KR want rid, i'd suggest they're possibly paying some of his wage whilst he's on loan (if the deal is confirmed)

Think you may be about on the mark with this one matey!

King, Cooke and Brough now there's a card school.
Get ready for the PARTY.

Happy with this signing and I think he may be a different player for us.

Worried re future of Brough though

I'm not sure he left Hull FC under a cloud, as my recollection is that he had been offered a new contract. They certainly didn't want him to go, as I recall. The fact that they didn't like where he went or the circumstances are different things altogether.

cooke= great player when he can be botherd, other than that, a complete pain in the ar$e

Rumour in Hull is Brough the other way.

id say going back on your word and your contract is leaving under a cloud,plus the fact he was sneaking around with his old man "agreeing" to join rovers behind his current employers backs....

Wrong.

Guess we'll see

I meant that there was no suggestion that his playing ability was in doubt or that he had fallen out with anyone, which was the earlier suggestion. The fact that he was doing the dirty behind the scenes doesn't mean that he wasn't cutting it on the pitch, and that's all that bothers me. If he comes to us and then does the dirty, like going to Cas, which is of course downright filthy, then we'll move on and boo him a bit when he returns.

We will.

no doubting cookes talent on the field, but off it he's a complete waste of time/...

Indeed, it's not made official by both clubs yet because Rovers want Brough

What as ? Hooker ? How many do you want ?

would they play brough at 9??? cus 7 is already mopped up with dobson..

I'm sure you're right, but I'm only interested in him for 80 minutes a week.

I'm not really concerned about his off the field stuff purely because he is a known quantity to our coach, as were King and Brough when they arrived. We know what we are getting.

I'd assume Brough will play 6 and be the running half we so desire

so do i, cus he was in a well know drininking area in hull 20 mins after you had been destroyed by hudds, leathered..

Must have mixed badly with his lemsip

I reckon it would be hooker, Murrell to 13, Galea to 6 (or vice versa) that would leave Fisher / Brough at 9 with hodgson as back up.

Hope it comes off, will certainly make for an attacking side.

The performance put in by his team mates merited nothing other than a complete drowning.

shame he wasnt in attendance with the rest of your squad isnt it!!!

Brough is an organising 7, not a running 6!

That aside, no deal can be done without Brough wanting it....the ball is in his court, he can and will have his pick of clubs, and will no doubt start a bidding war!