MC as usual, seems bang on the money with his reply. Why indeed, should SL be so damn keen to take every Aussie bad boy.

What a ridiculous post.... Because committing adultery is the same as being homosexual isn't it? I found out recently that someone I was close to had been having an affair and I genuinely lost a lot of respect for him... Funnily enough, I have never lost any respect for anyone because of their sexuality.

Has Terry Christian signed for Catalans Dragons?

on the eyes of folau yes read what he actually said

Hopefully yes

I believe flags of any colours, had been banned at rugby stadiums, due to obstructing the view of spectators, and possible use las a weapon. Do you think an exception should be made for Pride flags. Keep all flags outside the stadium.

Are you suggesting the LGBT community are silly and easily offended; or do you think there has for countless years, and continues to be, people who are persecuted, discriminated against, attacked and in some cases killed - for no reason other than their sexuality? I'd say the latter, so any show of support by the wider community can only be a positive thing, right?

Some of the opinions ‘spouted ‘ on here are almost as intolerant as the ones being condemned (rightly so).
There is no need though to launch all out attack on religion of whatever faith.

I blame Facebook and Twitter and all that crap for a lot of the ills in the modern world.

Actually that's a fair point though I think we can find a way of showing the pride colours without big flags.

I'll be wearing rainbow colours

Nice one Zippy.

And me

Unless they come knocking on my door preaching their religion to my face then they are fair game

Yes, and where you wear them, only your good lady will see them.

and that’s with a two week notice

only colours I’ll be wearing are red white and blue.

You got two of the colours there so I reckon that counts.

I'm not cool enough for Zippy.
I'm probably Rod or Freddie.

Anyone condoning the signing of IF are either ignorant, bigoted, or both.

Not in my book

By definition members of Pakistani grooming gangs as you describe them, are predatory paedophiles whereas I don't think that's quite the same for the Church of England.

Does that qualify as a point of difference? Or were you only asking knuckle draggers?

LOL. What a typically pompous diatribe. 1st time I've ever come across someone almost belittling the effect the actions of the Pakistani grooming communities have on young extremely vulnerable girls.

If you read through his post again, I dont think that is what he said, not at all ?

Congratulations on a flawless and total misunderstanding of absolutely everything I said - that's quite impressive, in a really unimpressive kind of way.

Maybe but the comparison you made was absurd. I think you'll find there are some people involved in the Church of England who aren't raping underage girls.

Yes, just as there are millions of Pakistani men who aren't grooming young girls.
Bren appeared to be asking where the mob were, trying to deal with the Christian paedophiles etc. He certainly wasn't defending the stuff going on with the grooming gangs.