Fully the Petition on your banner below as it finnished, as I was going to sign it but the only one I could find is this


This ePetition ran from 26/05/2011 to 30/06/2011 and has now finished.


1317 people signed this ePetition.

You said it explains several reasons why the punishment was as it was.

It doesn't.

The only thing that can possibly explain why the punishment was as it was is the quality of the footage that (in every case) is allowed to be submitted.

What you are inferring here, is that because those two got away with it, then deliberate foul play is ok !
Two wrongs dont make a right.
Why do you feel the need to defend the indefensible.
IMO there is no doubt about the intent, he should have received a longer ban.

Chase.......... Should be back for our Magic encounter at the Ethihad.

I think he was implying that should a player receive an injury from a deliberate or reckless act, and not miss any games (eyes and ears or bad cut type injury's) the system would not (wrongly) be applied.
He was pointing out that that would be unfair, i think!!

The web one has finished. Not sure if names can still be collected for paper one.

I was talking about as to why the Disciplinary Guidelines indicate why the 3 match ban was the one selected.

I'm not referring to anything about evidence?

Except his elbow is pointing towards the camera.

Secondly, it was either reckless or intentional - not both.

If it was intentional, he'd have had his elbow out from the start - he didn't.

The touchjudge should have seen it and acted on it, it wasn't far out from the side line.

remorse www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/17785159 whats all this about fellow country man remind who he wants to play for

remorse www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/17785159 whats all this about fellow country man remind who he wants to play for

I have no idea how you came to that conclusion



Someone said a player should be banned as long as a player is injured, I was pointing out 2 cases of serious foul play where bans were given, but no injury was received.

My question is, under this system they thought up where bans last as long as a player injury - would these types of foul be bannable?



That could also apply too.

The main problem with it is, when a bite/gouge etc cause no injury at all, will they not be banned for it? When just about everyone knows biting or gouging should be bannable offences in any sport.

Yes all foul play should like the current system just do what I said as well, it would be amazing how quickly the players would come around to it and maybe we wouldnt have to witness the disgraceful elbow smash we had to witnes last week because one jumped up little asswipe didn't get his own way.

Millwards has just come out with a beauty on Radio Leeds, when discussing the Chase incident. Ropati's head hit Rangi's shoulder.

It statements like those that I am glad Millward is not Head Coach of WTW

you couldn't make up the carp that basil came out with on radio leeds..... I will repeat for all the chase apologists,I had perfect view and it was chases elbow and to gain momentum he had both feet in the air.

basil is gonna say what "carrstleford" tell him to say otherwise he will be back at fev with another championship side next season getting out coached again



.

what about the fact that Ryan Bailey's offence of putting his hand on a referee was classed as the same grade as Chase's attack on Ropati, and given the same punishment just shows what an absolute bunch of retards run this sport.

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/17785159 The only reason Chase was "extremely upset", was because he got caught !!!! "We thought Rangi was guilty and so did he. The decision was fair and we're 100% behind the RFL's verdict." ........ Of course they thought it was fair....he ONLY got banned for 3 matches....absolute joke..

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/17785159 The only reason Chase was "extremely upset", was because he got caught !!!! "We thought Rangi was guilty and so did he. The decision was fair and we're 100% behind the RFL's verdict." ........ Of course they thought it was fair....he ONLY got banned for 3 matches....absolute joke..