You pass the dam things every day, how could you forget them, I’m, assuming the locals down your way, do know they aren’t real rhubarb.

They'd make quite a heavy crumble.

Think there’s only one out of 3 still standing now.Wonder how much of our council tax that eye sore cost

Only one left out of three, there’s a lot of locals down your way using false teeth then.

It would be a steal if it was 99k. It's actually 900k.

Isn't the plane provided for the Prime Minister of the party in power, maybe in years to come some other party leader may get the opportunity to fly in it.

Yep I know it's a branding that will be inside and out 99k would be Poundland effort!

Yes it is to save costs as I pointed out earlier

Not only that, but as one of the world leading countries it's in keeping with our position at the top table despite the scorn and bitterness heaped on them by some on here.

I read today that neither Apple or Google have any knowledge of the British Government talking to them about their system. They appear to also not be aware of any problem with regards accessing distance on the systems that have gone live.
I wonder if the government is lying again to cover up their failure on the app and late switch to the alternative model.

Horbury home of Onward Christian Soldiers but no marching?

don’t tell everybody.

I am not a member of the BAME community so don’t know how they are treated but many of you appear to be quite happy to ridicule their movement. I note you obviously hold the white lives matter movement to a lower standard because you do not ridicule their demonstration at the Churchill’s statue giving the nazi salute or urinating against a plaque for a fallen police officer.

I can't let that stand without saying I am not as you describe there. I can't speak for everyone but I haven't seen anyone ridiculing BLM.
What has been pointed out is that aggressive violent protests and damaging public property is unlawful no matter which side you are on.

Either be specific to a post or don't make the accusation. Don't include 'many' in a post like that.

I've said higher up what my views are but I am currently working with friends and colleagues at work to help myself understand what BLM is all about and what White Privilidge is.
It bugs me that some have latched on to a trend to either be pro something they don't care about or against it just for anarchy sake.
But either way it's an important subject and it appears to be drawing notice finally.

Both Apple and Google have already announced that future operating systems will support bluetooth tracking, so just need an app that's able to use it .

Not many people, including myself are denouncing the Black lives Matter section. What most people including myself object to is the Black Lives Movement. This is a dangerous far left movement, with disturbing ambitions. Don’t just take my word for it, vist the Black Lives Movement’s web site.

What disturbing ambitions?

Can’t find the right link now, but go - - - - - - - edited---------it’s a 25 minute video, please watch it all. Then let me know what you think.

That one guy doesn’t speak for all - he even says so himself!

As for Mike Graham, well...

It only takes one person to plant and grow a dangerous idea. That’s one of the reasons we have a democracy, if the majority of voters don’t like the idea, then the idea becomes withered.

Nah sorry. You claim that the group are dangerous but can't give any evidence apart from one interview on YouTube. That's not really fair is it.

Also, you can't use links to YouTube I'm afraid. AUP.

So which idea was the dangerous one?

What you said was: "What most people including myself object to is the Black Lives Movement. This is a dangerous far left movement, with disturbing ambitions"

But its gone from the movement having dangerous ambitions to one guys idea.

He is pretty badly trying to support his cause by ignoring anything that went wrong and blaming the police for everything. Can't see that getting much support. He even says it himself.
The defunding of the police is something started in the US by people upset by the treatment they receive. I understand it but it's never going to happen, mainly because it's a ridiculous idea.

INOUT

Garry McFarlane is apparently speaking for the BLM, was there anything in that interview he said, that you could agree with. He denied BLM assaults on the police, attacks on statues and the Cenotaph. He wants to defund the police and let the community police the streets. Blames inequality for black on black knife killing, legalise all drugs, He wants to introduce a 1917 style Russian revolution (that went well for the people didn’t it) he doesn’t see himself as British, he says he’s an Internationalist, whatever that is. There’s lot’s of other weird stuff I’ve left out. My opinion is, there is plenty of evidence on that video to suggest the people in that group are dangerous.
As for links to YouTube, I’m aware of AUP, therefore I’ve not put any onto this forum. Is it against AUP rules, to suggest people look for a topic on YouTube themselves.

Well I hope we can a least agree to disagree.
Good night PopTart.

Legalising drugs wouldn't be too bad a thing if you could regulate them and tax them. It'd be quite a good earner for the treasury. Look at fags and booze. The quality would also improve as you'd get less people cutting the stuff with cleaning products! Might also see less hospital admissions and deaths.