well do9n't I look silly....

Although getting a wakefield tattoo just proves how much of a nutter he is

You don't have to wear a shirt to be a fan I never wear anything to do with my team but go home and away stupid comment

You don't have to wear a shirt to be a fan I never wear anything to do with my team but go home and away stupid comment

True - but by wearing a shirt you are showing everyone else that you are a fan.

most people do though. If you cared to read the previous thread about this, the general consensus was "most of these will have just been fairweather fans and local lunatics"

hence my contibution was "they've not wearing any wakefield gear" .....which was wrong anyway. Don't let it get to you petal

Thats called being embarresed to wear your teams stuff!


Just kidding dont take it to heart.

I know 2 of those and have done for many, many years.... I can say for certain they are Wakefield fans and have been for as long as I can remember......not just casual fans but home and away every week for years fans......One of them is a non drinker aswell....t-total..... so people putting 2 and 2 together and saying drink was involved are wrong with one of those.....

Not sure what happened and don't really want to know really.... but disappointed to see........

Mark Judd looks familiar. Can't place him but I see him regularly and it's not at games.

And looking at those 5, they haven't even got the main culprit. The guy in the blue away shirt who went steaming in about 3 times with fists left, right and centre.

I spoke to Davide about the situation last night - he said that they're still working on catching another few people, so this one isn't over yet.

I'm surprised Huddersfield haven't come in for them!
Seriously though, well done to the club for taking decisive action.

If it is true that they are real fans,and as someone said one a non drinker I feel it is sad that they are to be banned without a proper investigation.
Have any of them a history of violent behaviour ?
Were any of them provoked?
Not in anyway condoning violent behaviour, but the powers that be really need to be sure of what went on.
In a court of law you are not guilty until etc etc.

The has been a proper investigation - that's why they've been banned.

Photographic evidence, Video evidence, witness testimony, what more do you need.

What happens in a court of law is irrelevant - the club have conducted their own investigation and have found sufficient evidence to issue a ban from their privately owned premises; they are perfectly entitled to do that and personally, I'm glad they've acted decisively.

They should of stayed in the Wakefield section and that guy in the blue top should have walked away.At the end of the day they went into the Widnes section to fight.

Even i can't fault the club on this one

Just concerned that things are all above board re.investigation.
I take it all who are absolutely sure are party to the investigation and have the ear of those conducting it.
I was once banned from a club when nutted for no reason, thrown out by the bouncers for fighting ,taken to to the cop shop and warned not to enter that city centre again.
All I am saying is make sure of the facts.
By the way anyone remember Bin Lid in Dewsbury?

Not at all, i justfeel that the club would not have acted without photo and fan statement on this one.



Yeah sorry about that mate

on a serious note that can happen all too easy.

did the ban work or did any of the 5 manage to enter the game on Friday night, reason I'm saying this I can't see how they can implement this with such an old style entry

So, Widnes fans ejected from the KC

Fighting amongst themselves and with the stewards apparently.

Yeah something happened, stewards went in, couple of wild swinging punches from one fan. 3 got taken away i think

Why would you think they were not above board?