Just a couple of points on this subject which I find very interesting. I think a move back to Wakefiled Trinity RLFC would be a good choice. WTW seems a bit too long-winded for me and SKY always refer to the club as simply Wakefield Wildcats (cringe) which would be a terrible choice IMO.

Someone mentioned Hull KR's style of marketing the logo and mascot. A simple logo (with no animal attachment) but a mascot (a Robin) for the kids to look up to. A similar marketing style can be said for Saints (St Bernard) and now successfully Wigan (a Warrior).

Some clubs have had great success from using the monicker (Rhinos, Bull, Wolves and even my club - Tigers) but its not for everyones taste and doesn't always fit in with the traditionist supporters views.

Some clubs have made poor choices when trying to sex-up their brand and have been riduculed for it - Halifax Blue Sox and Hull Sharks were disasterous concepts and didn't last long.

Some clubs have had a monicker since their birth - Sheffield Eagles, Catalan Dragons, Gatehead Thunder and Wakefield Trinity and it wouldn't be the same without these iconic brands.

The fleur-de-ley design and Trinity monicker is a great and famous badge that should be reintroduced IMO. Its only minute detail when you look at the big picture and with all the other stuff going on ATM but I'm certain it would be a great seller of merchandise - something that the club is crying out for.

This is the solution.

As an aside, as soon as Glover described himself along the lines of a "long time Wildcats fan" his credibility was shot.

The plus for Leeds and Warrington is that they didn't have second names (ie, Trinity). Halifax picked a bad name and Hull had "FC". Bulls worked because they used it so well as an early marketing tool following on from Cougarmania (it also suited their style of play, which was big lumbering things going backwards and forwards on a muddy field). Tigers is peffect for Cas, of course, because it matches their existing strip.

The thing with the Wildcats thing is that a significant portion don't like it. Of those that do like it, do any dislike "Trinity"? For the Wildcats brand, it feels like the camp is split between dislikes and don't minds, which is hardly a ringing endorsement.

Kids probably love it, and may consider Trinity to be a boring name without a grasp of the history, however once they get over the age of 10 then this may change. Wildcats becomes a childish/babyish add on just when they want to come across as more grown up.

It is good to see the Guardian drop Wildcats from their articles regarding Wakefield. I wish more would do the same, including the official website address and socoal media. I wonder how many kids don't even realise Trinity is part of the clubs name.

still the dreadnoughts for me

And me!

Being a child of the 60's Dreadnoughts for me as well.

Can I jump on the Dreadnought bandwagon too ?

we could but then what about all the fings in the shop we would have to bin them and buy new ones but we dont have the cash to do that because we still have to buy a half back and that will cost us lots of cash or we could put lee smith at half back and put vince back at this could work out

ps putting a subject to explain more about this half back problem.