ti sha nebe cisentaflyilc ropven on tammer htwa deror het dorws ear ni ouy nac dear eth netsenec

No great loss that its specifically Moore who is going if true, big gamble he is ever going to recapture his pre-ilness form - I would be happy to take the chance he won't.

What is slightly concerning though, again if true, is that we seem to have lost another player from the pack - an area that we really do need to strengthen and not loose bodies from (hookers not included of course). Squad looking particularly unbalanced, more so if he does go.

I could not agree more, well said

He hasn't been the same player since his illness so i've no problem with him being released from his contract providing he is replaced with someone of suitable quality. We now though need to find two decent props as we were already one short.

that's a mouth full

Radio Leeds have been playing an interview with JK stating that we aren't signing Burnett from Hull because of financial budget constraints, so perhaps we are now.
Another point, the club stood by RM when there was 'bother' with Ollie Wilkes.

Id hope hed be replaced by a prop not another second rower. But i bet theres not much left to go for

But taht is olny a hlaf tutrh, the frsit and lsat ltertes need to be in the rhigt pclae.


This one is good

There are no tricks to the test. Read this sentence:

FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF
SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH
THE EXPERIENCE OF YEARS.

Count the 'F's

To get all of them is apparently considered genius.

Going back to Moore, if it is true then so be it. He was good before the Crohn's Disease but very much a bit player afterwards. He needed the us more than we needed him, now he believes his future lies elsewhere. Not a major loss but a concern if the rumoured reasons are true.

If our budget is already all spent then its going be an awfully long season.

One out / one in.

And what about leaeno? Wouldnt that be two out

Going back to Moore, if it is true then so be it. He was good before the Crohn's Disease but very much a bit player afterwards. He needed the us more than we needed him, now he believes his future lies elsewhere. Not a major loss but a concern if the rumoured reasons are true.'"

Not been the same player since his illness which is a shame because he was far and away our best forward for a while. Not so keen on the way he's conducted himself since his illness. Sad to say he wont really be missed on last seasons form.

Currect even with a new prop we are still a prop short.

Sorry - already written him off! May have to wait for his replacement!

Very light pack now. If moore goes we need two atleast

So thats two out two in then?

Saw him in freeport today.. Cas bound??

Agreed with what most posters have said, never been same since he got crohns and was very average last season..
Has SBK seen Hickey in the SB car park yet?? or any other props...

Sort of, maybe.... but with Moore it will all become clearer sooner rather than later - afaik.

If moore goes we need hickey and bennett.

R

a simple yes and some names would have done

No great loss in my opinion, never been the same since his ilness.

We now need to sign 2 props i believe or we are going to be very lightweight in the pack.

Hicky is done and dusted, just waiting for his paperwork.

As for the other it could be Burnett but he is a second rower and this would syill leave us a prop short.

Anyone else wish we had done more to keep Snitch?

No. Our budget wasn't big enough end of

so the topic poster said he welsh bound so that mean its a player exchange ?? if u say it will become clear so who plays for the crusaders who has played under kear before and plays prop mmmmm can only think of one but i am sermissing

who? If you mean thackery hes signed for barrow