Of course we do. Saints were poor. Only played for 20 mins but still won. Trinity need to win games like these if they are to stay up.

Speak for yourself, I'm already worried who ref might be for next weeks game

Some of what you say is true, the referee won't be like that every game. Sains are undefeated for a reason. We are still improving and no-one expected us to win today.

I bet the dark winter nights just fly by in your house. Jeez

Does anyone think Ali will get a ban

No I imagine no one did but it doesn't mean Trinity shouldn't have done. When the top teams are below par that's the games which will make the difference. This team still has no brains, no composure and no obvious game plan. Panic rugby people are calling it, it's been a trait for three seasons now.

Not a chance. It wasn't even worthy of a penalty never mind putting on report.

Poor refereeing, poor goal line defence, poor handling, poor team selection, poor use of substitutes. Other than that a good day.

Lomax slipped as Ali went to tackle him so it made it look bad Amor on Ryan was with full intention of taking the player out.

Firstly Roby should be strung up and shot for that performance, he was abysmal. The standard of the officials in superleague is beyond a joke and it is becoming very tiresome. Daft errors and soft defence cost us, and our halfbacks were back to looking like strangers at times again. Also Keinhorst was obviously not fit so why was he picked over Sykes? And then why give Siejka ten minutes in the centre? Agar got that wrong again i'm afraid. Good stuff by the forwards, especially Tautai, Anderson & Ryan.

Agar said after the match Seijka was meant to spell at hooker but due to injuries it messed up the rotations of the squad.

Don't see how. Rotate the props, Ryan to play in the centre. Interchange the hookers. What is evident is asking 15 players to do job of 17 will likely lead to one outcome. The decision to have Siejka as a hooker is poor in itself.

Kirmond went off injured, Ryan to SR. Seijka to centre. Seijka to hooker is poor in it self? Didn't know you had vast information on a lad without watching him train nor play.

I know DK went off injured, before that? Siejka is a half yet was favoured over a lad who plays 9 regularly?

Agar picks the team which he'll think will do the job, unfortunately for us injuries riddled us. Changes had to be made and some halves are able to play hooker its not much of a change, people on here said it looked like he had been training at 9 so?

I get an uneasy sense that you weren't entirely disappointed with the result today, mainly because it offered you the opportunity to continue with this crusade of tiresome vitriol against the coach.

I like Wildie and I think he will go well in the squad this year but we have signed the new lad and I was looking forward to seeing how he went. I'm sure Agar will pick who he thinks will win him games after it's our passion whereas it's his livelihood.

Maybe my glass is half full but I will continue to focus on the positives and show my support because I genuinely believe that as a club we seem to on the right track for once.

The wildie/Seijka thing is not the issue with me as I can understand both sides of the argument.
However I think Agar has made a massive error of judgement with Keinhorst again !!!. To me that's what caused
all the rotation problems not Seijka.

That sounds incredibly childish.

Lomax has three plates in his head from a rugby injury when playing for his school. Of all our players he is least likely to play 'the dying swan'. He was in intensive care for a long time as a result of his head injury and having some of his skull removed will no doubt leave him vulnerable to head shots.

I was behind the posts and it looked like Lomax was running to the right, tried to turn/sidestep to the left and slipped as he had done a couple of times earlier in the game. As he fell backwards, his feet (and therefore the rest of him) were still travelling to the right and Ali was gong in to tackle him - Ali's hands were no higher than waist height and he did make contact with Lomax's head but it wasn't intentional, it wasn't his fault that Lomax had chosen the wrong studs. If Lomax hadn't fallen, Ali's tackle would have just been a standard tackle.

Should he get a ban? - definitely no
Will he get a ban ? - no, if the RFL have any integrity.

As for Amor, that looked to be a more blatant head high tackle but like most of us on here I am biased. Ryan may have side stepped / slipped / ducked a bit but if Ali gets anything then Amor should get at least 3 times the penalty.

Keinhorst didn't work today, was feeling his hamstring after 10 mins, off after about 20 or 25.
Not good selection in my eyes, as his hamstring had more bandage on it than a mummy.

Who plays nine yes.. But not to any significant standard!

He sounds like an insurance nightmare!

Can accept anyone is vulnerable to head shots.
But when Lomax is slipping and his head is at waist height, what's a player to do?

Old injury aside, Lomax milked that for all it was worth; it was football-esque.

Particularly galling when earlier, he'd left Riley down for 5 minutes before he even noticed, then totally ignored Lomax cynically taking out Godinet. To add insult to injury, none of the 3 officials saw Amor come off second best against Ryan, so come back with a massive swinging arm.

I didn't have a problem with Lomax. It was a hard clash to the head and he need to be checked out.
Ali was concerned as well and made a point of waiting around and checking he was ok.

But at the end of the day he slipped over before the tackle. I thought he actually hit Ali's knee which could have been just as damaging the other way.
No need for a penalty at all. Over reaction from ref.