No, but too many on here believe they are and still can't come up with a consensus of who to play and where.

And most say Sammut at 6 and Godinet at 7 it was working why change it.Oh dear forgot Agar had to get Seijka in somewhere instead of telling him he would have to fight to get a spot more so after the length of time he has been out of the game through injury you would at least bring him in steady away but no its bang straight in.

I have no idea why it was changed but looking on the forum the majority are now showing Sammut at full back. I presume he must have got this correct so we are left with either Sykes or Seijka to fill his stand off spot. I would personally put Mathers to full back but Agar and most of the forum disagree.

I would ask you who do you think should be at full back because to release Sammut to play stand off someone will need to play there. I know that the usual forum member will suggest Wilde a player he selects in everyone of his teams but not necessarily in the same position.

Probably just coincidence that your two stand out players both started their careers at Cas

It must be terrible when other teams field your ex players.

Would you play Walshaw and Tautai in the 17 next week? If so where would you play them?

I hope we line up like this

Mathers
Fox
Collis
Walshaw
Riley

Sammut
Godinet

Moore
McShane
Raleigh
Kirmond
Annakin
Tautai

Wildie
Molloy
Anderson
Smith

What I think Agar will do

Moore
Sammut
McShane
Washbrook
Tautai

Kirmond
Ryan

Sykes
Raleigh
Annakin
Mathers
Fox
Godinet

I would have
Sammut
Lyne
Collis
Walshaw
Riley

Siejka
Godinet

Anderson
Mcshane
Moore
Kirmond
Ryan
Tautai

Sykes
Annakin
Smith
Molloy

Sammut
Lyne/Fox (both defensively bad but good in attack)
Collis
Walshaw
Riley

Siejka
Godinet

Moore
McShane
Anderson
Kirmond
Ryan
Tautai

Smith
Annakin
Scruton
Sykes/Molloy (depending on game plan)

Yeh I would have lyne in front of fox because they both carnt defend but lyne is faster and younger so time to get better

It is mate, breaks my heart every time RM turns out for you.

In reality the money for Westerman was much needed at the time and i know trin have lost some good players for the same reason. Thompson is a different case. I was sorry to see him go as i always liked him from the moment he started in the academy, but once he had made his mind up to go (agent?) he was just going through the motions on the field. Whether we like to admit it or not neither of us are big clubs and we will always lose players to the clubs who have money but no production line.

We've felt the same when watching Huddersfield over recent seasons

Snitch, McDonald, Griffin, Mason, Ferguson, Wood, Brough, Murphy, Grix, George.

Sammut needs to be at 6 as he is more involved in the game and being an off the cuff player when he does do something its more effective.Alas Mathers is our most experienced player at full back as bad as he can be at times our other options at full back are Sykes or Jowitt.It might be that Seijka comes good but at the moment we need that experience of Sammut and Godinet.When/if we get away from relegation without any worry then we can look at other combinations but playing the more experienced players who will cause other sides big problems has to be number one priority at this moment.

Tautai yes probably as a sub due to his versatility however his type of game does limit the time he is on the pitch? Walshaw's problem was he could not play for 80 minutes and to play in the centres you need to because the subs bench seldom includes cover for this position. I guess it will be where he wants to play Ryan will dictate if there is a place for Walshaw.

You interchange Tautai with Moore, so you don't lose the aggression in the forwards.
Walshaw could play 80 mins in the centre as he is not required to do as much contact or tackling.
But I fear he will miss out again through no fault of his own.

Do you really believe we'll have one ??????

Agar doesnt know what game plan means

Starting to look forward to the game on Sunday

and just occasionally (most notably the play off game a few seasons ago), we come away with 2 points.
The squad should be as fresh as the can possibly be and with Agar having plenty to prove against his former employer, I'm hoping that we can finally put together a decent 80 minutes.
Whether it will be enough to take the 2 points, who knows but, it should be a decent game.

Come on Trin !

The 2 weeks off will go one of two ways; we'll either look refreshed, well drilled, and eager to get back to winning ways, or we'll look like a team who have never played a game of rugby league before!

Hull have also had a week to prepare for this game. I think it will be a close contest this one with just one try in it.

Hull by 14.

OK, that's covered the 1st 5 minutes. How will we respond to been 6-0 down from then on?

We're going to fight all the way and come away with 2 league points