just thought id have a bash

1 grix
2 blaydire
3 martin
4 gleeson
5 useless
6 rooney
7 brough
8 korki
9 drew
10 bibey
11 snitch
12 stosic
13 fergy
14 latu
15 wilkes
16 frank
17 pitts

peto on wing till someone is fit and id try and switch blaydire with grix and frank could slot 2nd two or centre

1 blaymire
2 george
3 martin
4 gleeson
5 peterson
6 rooney
7 brough
8 korki
9 drew
10 bibey
11 snitch
12 wilkes
13 fergy

14 latu
15 sausage
16 moore
17 frank/pitts

round pegs in roundish holes for me

1 Blaymire
2 George
3 Gleeson
4 Martin
5 Hypochondriac
6 Grix
7 Brough
8 Stosic
9 Drew
10 Wilkes
11 Snitch
12 Winterstein
13 Ferguson

Subs
Henderson
Latu
Stosic
Bibey/Pitts

1. Blaymire
2. George
3. Martin
4. Gleeson
5. Peto (Murphy if fit)
6. Grix
7. Brough
8. Wilkes
9. Drew
10. Stosic
11. Snitch
12. Pitts
13. Ferguson

14. Latu
15. Bibey
16. Moore
17. Winterstein

Just a suggestion .You have all picked Peterson because of no other option.

You have all also dropped Rooney. Why not put Rooney on the wing he has done it before ans wasn't too bad and at least he'd put more effort in than Peterson.

Probably cos Peterson's a winger, and Rooney is a stand off.

It's hard to tell TBH.

Young Murphy's worth two of him.

How did you arrive at that conclusion ?
All I am going on is what I have seen so far, Rooney would still do a better job than him on the wing.

1 i think peterson gets way too much flack largely due to foxes progression, bad decision by club move on!

2. now grix appears to have regained his shattered confidence, he could reproduce the world cup form at stand off

3 the love affair with Jr is going though a really bad patch.

Would Rooney offer the team more than sick note playing on the wing?


YES, it's not ideal but YES he would.

1 peterson is one of the worst signings ive ever seen

2 grix cant defend

3 sell him

Big Al

Thanks for that. I'd just like to correct you on one thing, shouldn't you have put standing on the wing rarther than playing on it.

Sorry, but I think that's rubbish. Its already been mentioned about picking players in their right positions - rather than picking somebody cos you think they should be in the side (see posts about Obst, Drew, Grix, Latu etc).

Drop Peterson then fine, but only for Murphy or George.

Not fit, so do we persist with Peto or give Rooney a go, agreed we should stick to players in position but in the case i just don't know.

peterson was very ineffectual today no doubt, but on the games he has played he hasn't been that bad. the issue is getting him on the field.
his injuries have made him a very poor signing thus far not his performances as such.
the thing i would say is did we really need to go to such lengths/cost to sign a winger considering our financial constraints? i said this at the time also.
however he is copping undue flak imo

i'd go with that. think its definitely time that frank got his chance. seems to have gone ok when i have watched him

He was fit today, did he make any effort to help the team? so he's missing half the time and when he's fit he goes missing.

Waste of a shirt imo.

so you saying he made no effort? there is a big difference between playing poorly and not caring which is what i assume you are implying. i dont go with that it strikes me as a lazy, easy to make criticism of a player. there was one set where he made 2 drives in 3 plays in the middle of the park, trying to get himself into the game. that doesn't strike me as the actions of someone who didn't put effort in when he could of just stayed on his wing. if your team is not playing particularly well and you are not dominating possession it can hard for forwards to get involved never mind wingers

i am hes a lazy overpaid sicknote worst player in our history is that ok

Hey Dick Turpin at least had the decency to wear a mask before he robbed people.

Sorry but i think he's on holiday.

say what you want i couldn't care less but nothing is as black and white as some people try to make out

your right

your right

your wrong

with such eloquence i'm sure you can only be right