He is extremely fortunate that Leigh picked up so few injuries last year and managed to complete a season only using around 26 players. Hopefully Lam will find out what it's like going into a match without a recognised back available or having no front row or having to use third choice half backs then he may have a glimpse of what Mark Applegarth went through last year without blaming pitches, opposition, judiciary or even Asiata for taking players out at will.
Quote="Cokey"Asiata has not committed an unlawful tackle (this season or last), and that has been deemed thus by the rules, and the MRP. If you're laughing at injured players, you should be pointed out as a sick fan, and a sick individual.
'"
It was an illegal tackle hence the card following video review, the fact that the panel didn't add any ban or fine means that NFA required and yellow sufficient. What part of that do you not understand?
Quote="Cokey"Asiata has not committed an unlawful tackle (this season or last), and that has been deemed thus by the rules, and the MRP. If you're laughing at injured players, you should be pointed out as a sick fan, and a sick individual.
'"
LOL not a sick individual or a sick fan and not laughing at a injured player . A lot of years ago was leaving Leigh, after a match on a Wakefield supporters bus when a building brick came through the bus window . Think that is the kind of fans that sums up your statement .
Quote="financialtimes"It was an illegal tackle hence the card following video review, the fact that the panel didn't add any ban or fine means that NFA required and yellow sufficient. What part of that do you not understand?
'"
If that tackle was illegal he should be facing a lengthy ban, hence it wasn't illegal "No ban".What part of that do you not understand?
Quote="financialtimes"It was an illegal tackle hence the card following video review, the fact that the panel didn't add any ban or fine means that NFA required and yellow sufficient. What part of that do you not understand?
'"
If that tackle was illegal he should be facing a lengthy ban, hence it wasn't illegal "No ban".What part of that do you not understand?
Quote="vastman"Lam needs to get a grip. It’s been raining solidly for two month. All pitches are heavy, the bloke simply can’t take a loss without some feeble moan'"
Maybe he does but, I was alluding to the tackle challenges, that's all.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.