He was clearly playing injured esp the 2nd half where he could not tackle . Like most the key is for him to remain fit.

[quote="PopTart":8v6p6scc]"Hearing on social media" could just be you two talking if you don't qualify it by saying where.[/quote:8v6p6scc] I don’t post much but it was on the trinity fan group. Won’t post people’s names but just a couple of posts. No real substance to them as yet, if ever.

[quote="FIL":2l23oxke]Full details here... https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/sa ... r-revealed[/quote:2l23oxke] Leaving space for a couple of players could have been a master stroke here. A couple of strong players from a team who finished in playoffs could really give us a positive boost. I guess any transfer fee would be welcome and aid Salford too.

[quote="FIL":2l23oxke]Full details here... https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/sa ... r-revealed[/quote:2l23oxke] Leaving space for a couple of players could have been a master stroke here. A couple of strong players from a team who finished in playoffs could really give us a positive boost. I guess any transfer fee would be welcome and aid Salford too.

[quote="Trojan Horse":2ba1o8vh]I don’t post much but it was on the trinity fan group. Won’t post people’s names but just a couple of posts. No real substance to them as yet, if ever.[/quote:2ba1o8vh] I can see one comment completely out of context from a very suspect poster. For me 'I'm hearing on social media' is misleading.

[quote="Trojan Horse":j6i174ck]Leaving space for a couple of players could have been a master stroke here. A couple of strong players from a team who finished in playoffs could really give us a positive boost. I guess any transfer fee would be welcome and aid Salford too.[/quote:j6i174ck] The thing is, if they'd sold a player a week ago they'd have got a better fee than now when everyone knows they have to sell. The money they have to save isn't all in player contracts but it's a significant number so they are going to have to lose a few.

[quote="PopTart":7t7hsea0]The thing is, if they'd sold a player a week ago they'd have got a better fee than now when everyone knows they have to sell. The money they have to save isn't all in player contracts but it's a significant number so they are going to have to lose a few.[/quote:7t7hsea0] I assume the 800k reductions in overheads will pretty much be all in player contracts, being that they need to get down to £1.2million on the cap, I doubt they are very far off 2 million as they were at 1.8 last year before signing the likes of Marsters, Nikorema and Hill.