Thank you for your guidance.

The key adjective '[iallegedly[/i' was added to what we averred and with that caveat defamation is to all intents and purposes not an issue.

Anyhow, we have evidence and we are contact with the appropriate parties.

Allegedly....

Let me stop you there Nestegg.
Just throwing allegedly in does not do enough for me, especially when you are the only one I have seen allege it. Don't do it again.

Please don't derail the thread/forum with your campaign. Everyone knows where the Bradford forum is if we need to find you to discuss it further.

Really? A quick post of the "RFL" followed by "Corrupt" in google brings up plenty - Threads on RLFANS.com, articles from former players, I will point you to only recently a SL club chairman accusing the RFL of been bias to one club over another in the selection and performance of match officials.

Not my view at all tbh, but you cant say he is the only one you have seen allege it, I remember some of the posts on here when the head of refereeing walked down the tunnel at HT at Belle Vue in his Saints jacket....

That really helps me a lot thanks

None of those examples are on here. We can't have that conversation on here as, just as Fish explained, corruption is a serious accusation and although Nestegg talks a lot about evidence he doesn't actually share it.

So now it's a conversation I have to lock the thread.
You are welcome to discuss directly with Nestegg if you wish as long as it's not on here.