Quote ="wrencat1873"The reduction in numbers seems to get a mention every time one tunes in to either the radio or TV.
however, fewer teams may not = less sponsorship.
If a "more competetive league" creates more intense matches with smaller winning margins, then even Mr Wood should be able to conjure up a decent deal with Sky.
There desperately needs to be some improvement with London, whose crowds are an embarrassment to the sport (closely followed by Salford - although you would expect them to improve in the medium term) and should London drop down a division, who knows what happens to the sponsorship deal, I guess we would find out then, just how much Sky want a London based team in the tiop flight.'"
Let's look at the evidence to support that
2012 - SL sponsorship "sold" to Stobarts for nothing
2013 - Does the league have any sponsorship yet this season?
IMO Mr Wood spends too much time consulting with Peter's Pies and not enough time talking to other potential sponsors.
If you truly believe Nigel Wood could get a better deal form SKY for a reduced competition (even if it was more competitive) you are
