I think the main complaints from folk were along the lines of...
1) there hardly ever seems to be any winners apart from a £3000 once every three or four months.
2) not so much the 1873 thing, but more recently retaining young players doesn't appear to be that high on the agenda, look at the number of young players that have moved on as not wanted. therefore, why put the work in for Shudds, etc.. to clean up our talent afterwards.
Everyone who hears about the work that is happening are in favour, but I believe, that if there was a prize of £500 or £1000 at every home game, then there would be more interest in the scheme. And as for retaining young players, thats something that only the club can sort out.
Presentation very good. But one important thing missing.The conclusion of explaining where the money is being spent should have been shown via a pie graph at the very end. No doubt the graph would not be the same every year because priorities will change.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
'"
