WH has tended to keep things factual.

Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.

WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?

I hope to God the RFL arent bank rolling them.
They are already starting to amass County Court Judgements - one awarded against them in Jan 09 ,jeez before the season even started.

some posters make smug remarks to make themselves look intelligent - common amongst posters who are bell ends

Do they now. oh dear

Another thread that promised so much to so many,
but delivered so little to so few....